<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Angelina Jolie Not Committed To Bonding With Children, Us Mag Says What Many Are Thinking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/</link>
	<description>Celebrity gossip from our lips to yours</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:26:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Camp Coker</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-5765</link>
		<dc:creator>Camp Coker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-5765</guid>
		<description>MO, Zahara&#039;s beautiful in her own way as Shiloh is in hers. I do notice that in recent times it&#039;s not Mommy Jolie holding the later but Daddy Pitt. And when she&#039;s in a picture with the child there&#039;s no eye or physical contact between the two--What is friggin&#039; wrong with this picture?  As for her &quot;priviledge birth&quot; comment regarding her younger daughter--Having been born into money over a mother&#039;s arms bathing and showing love for her just doesn&#039;t cut it!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MO, Zahara&#8217;s beautiful in her own way as Shiloh is in hers. I do notice that in recent times it&#8217;s not Mommy Jolie holding the later but Daddy Pitt. And when she&#8217;s in a picture with the child there&#8217;s no eye or physical contact between the two&#8211;What is friggin&#8217; wrong with this picture?  As for her &#8220;priviledge birth&#8221; comment regarding her younger daughter&#8211;Having been born into money over a mother&#8217;s arms bathing and showing love for her just doesn&#8217;t cut it!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GlossLip &#187; Angelina Jolie&#8217;s Allegiance To People Magazine Is Having Repercussions</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-5045</link>
		<dc:creator>GlossLip &#187; Angelina Jolie&#8217;s Allegiance To People Magazine Is Having Repercussions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-5045</guid>
		<description>[...] week Us Magazine came out with a rather tame article criticizing Angelina Jolie&#8217;s recent behavior.Â  The front [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week Us Magazine came out with a rather tame article criticizing Angelina Jolie&#8217;s recent behavior.Â  The front [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SA</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-4851</link>
		<dc:creator>SA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 05:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4851</guid>
		<description>Zahara is beautiful.I can&#039;t believe anyone would think otherwise.But besides that.What&#039;s wrong with you. Your saying this about an innocent little baby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zahara is beautiful.I can&#8217;t believe anyone would think otherwise.But besides that.What&#8217;s wrong with you. Your saying this about an innocent little baby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJA</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-4794</link>
		<dc:creator>DJA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4794</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s obvious Angelina feels more for M and Z than for her own daughter. I just can&#039;t comprehend how she can favour this uggly little troll Zahara over her own beautiful daughter. It&#039;s only a matter of time until Brad leaves her and gets full custody of Shiloh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s obvious Angelina feels more for M and Z than for her own daughter. I just can&#8217;t comprehend how she can favour this uggly little troll Zahara over her own beautiful daughter. It&#8217;s only a matter of time until Brad leaves her and gets full custody of Shiloh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cgalore</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-4736</link>
		<dc:creator>Cgalore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 09:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4736</guid>
		<description>Wow all the haters.  Leave them alone.  Angelina loves all her children and you can see that. If a woman who has a heart to adopt the unfortunate kids, she&#039;s got a bigger heart for her biological child.  Grow up people.  I&#039;m the one who should be bitter that my adoption didn&#039;t go through:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow all the haters.  Leave them alone.  Angelina loves all her children and you can see that. If a woman who has a heart to adopt the unfortunate kids, she&#8217;s got a bigger heart for her biological child.  Grow up people.  I&#8217;m the one who should be bitter that my adoption didn&#8217;t go through:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angela</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-4642</link>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4642</guid>
		<description>She never said I will quit working all togehter. She said at the  moment . She has more than 3 moths to do that. If you take a materniy leave from your work that will be about the same  time. Just leave her alone. She is doing her best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She never said I will quit working all togehter. She said at the  moment . She has more than 3 moths to do that. If you take a materniy leave from your work that will be about the same  time. Just leave her alone. She is doing her best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmdo1016</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-4637</link>
		<dc:creator>dmdo1016</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4637</guid>
		<description>Angelina is a she-witch.  End of discussion.  I also see &quot;V&quot; bailed.  How shocking when faced with direct quotes that fans of Angelina&#039;s are left speechless.

SHE-WITCH!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angelina is a she-witch.  End of discussion.  I also see &#8220;V&#8221; bailed.  How shocking when faced with direct quotes that fans of Angelina&#8217;s are left speechless.</p>
<p>SHE-WITCH!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-4608</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4608</guid>
		<description>Calling your GORGEOUS baby a &quot;blob&quot; is not exactly sensitive and loving.  Do you honestly think the baby doesn&#039;t know of her indifference?  She PROJECTS all these emotions on these children, who, in fact, have their own.  Loving children is extremely selfless.  I think Angelina is far too narcisstic for the job.  Thank God little Shiloh has her Daddy, who seems to adore her, as he (and her mother) should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calling your GORGEOUS baby a &#8220;blob&#8221; is not exactly sensitive and loving.  Do you honestly think the baby doesn&#8217;t know of her indifference?  She PROJECTS all these emotions on these children, who, in fact, have their own.  Loving children is extremely selfless.  I think Angelina is far too narcisstic for the job.  Thank God little Shiloh has her Daddy, who seems to adore her, as he (and her mother) should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-4605</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 05:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4605</guid>
		<description>Oh yes Clarity, People magazine is pure evil and US Magazine is the last bastion of fine journalism. Give me a freakig break. While I do appreciate your pseudo-intellectual lecture on journalism (Edward R. Murrow is probably rolling over in his grave after reading your post), you are taking the side of a tabloid. A TABLOID. If you know anything about journalism as you seem to claim, you should know better than to take anything these tabloids say seriously. I do commend you for investing that much time and thought into something as important as a hollywood celebrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes Clarity, People magazine is pure evil and US Magazine is the last bastion of fine journalism. Give me a freakig break. While I do appreciate your pseudo-intellectual lecture on journalism (Edward R. Murrow is probably rolling over in his grave after reading your post), you are taking the side of a tabloid. A TABLOID. If you know anything about journalism as you seem to claim, you should know better than to take anything these tabloids say seriously. I do commend you for investing that much time and thought into something as important as a hollywood celebrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-4604</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 05:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4604</guid>
		<description>Oh yes Clarity, People magazine is pure evil and US Magazine is the last bastion of fine journalism. Give me a freakig break. While I do appreciate your pseudo-intellectual lecture on journalism (Edward R. Murrow is probably rolling over in his grave after reading your post), you are taking the side of a tabloid. A TABLOID. If you know anything about journalism as you seem to claim, you should know better than to take anything these tabloids say with a grain of salt. I do commend you for investing that much time and thought into something as important as a hollywood celebrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes Clarity, People magazine is pure evil and US Magazine is the last bastion of fine journalism. Give me a freakig break. While I do appreciate your pseudo-intellectual lecture on journalism (Edward R. Murrow is probably rolling over in his grave after reading your post), you are taking the side of a tabloid. A TABLOID. If you know anything about journalism as you seem to claim, you should know better than to take anything these tabloids say with a grain of salt. I do commend you for investing that much time and thought into something as important as a hollywood celebrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
