<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Angelina Jolie Not Committed To Bonding With Children, Us Mag Says What Many Are Thinking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/</link>
	<description>Celebrity gossip from our lips to yours</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Camp Coker</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-5765</link>
		<dc:creator>Camp Coker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-5765</guid>
		<description>MO, Zahara's beautiful in her own way as Shiloh is in hers. I do notice that in recent times it's not Mommy Jolie holding the later but Daddy Pitt. And when she's in a picture with the child there's no eye or physical contact between the two--What is friggin' wrong with this picture?  As for her "priviledge birth" comment regarding her younger daughter--Having been born into money over a mother's arms bathing and showing love for her just doesn't cut it!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MO, Zahara&#8217;s beautiful in her own way as Shiloh is in hers. I do notice that in recent times it&#8217;s not Mommy Jolie holding the later but Daddy Pitt. And when she&#8217;s in a picture with the child there&#8217;s no eye or physical contact between the two&#8211;What is friggin&#8217; wrong with this picture?  As for her &#8220;priviledge birth&#8221; comment regarding her younger daughter&#8211;Having been born into money over a mother&#8217;s arms bathing and showing love for her just doesn&#8217;t cut it!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GlossLip &#187; Angelina Jolie&#8217;s Allegiance To People Magazine Is Having Repercussions</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-5045</link>
		<dc:creator>GlossLip &#187; Angelina Jolie&#8217;s Allegiance To People Magazine Is Having Repercussions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-5045</guid>
		<description>[...] week Us Magazine came out with a rather tame article criticizing Angelina Jolie&#8217;s recent behavior.Â  The front [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week Us Magazine came out with a rather tame article criticizing Angelina Jolie&#8217;s recent behavior.Â  The front [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SA</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4851</link>
		<dc:creator>SA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 05:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4851</guid>
		<description>Zahara is beautiful.I can't believe anyone would think otherwise.But besides that.What's wrong with you. Your saying this about an innocent little baby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zahara is beautiful.I can&#8217;t believe anyone would think otherwise.But besides that.What&#8217;s wrong with you. Your saying this about an innocent little baby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJA</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4794</link>
		<dc:creator>DJA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4794</guid>
		<description>It's obvious Angelina feels more for M and Z than for her own daughter. I just can't comprehend how she can favour this uggly little troll Zahara over her own beautiful daughter. It's only a matter of time until Brad leaves her and gets full custody of Shiloh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s obvious Angelina feels more for M and Z than for her own daughter. I just can&#8217;t comprehend how she can favour this uggly little troll Zahara over her own beautiful daughter. It&#8217;s only a matter of time until Brad leaves her and gets full custody of Shiloh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cgalore</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4736</link>
		<dc:creator>Cgalore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 09:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4736</guid>
		<description>Wow all the haters.  Leave them alone.  Angelina loves all her children and you can see that. If a woman who has a heart to adopt the unfortunate kids, she's got a bigger heart for her biological child.  Grow up people.  I'm the one who should be bitter that my adoption didn't go through:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow all the haters.  Leave them alone.  Angelina loves all her children and you can see that. If a woman who has a heart to adopt the unfortunate kids, she&#8217;s got a bigger heart for her biological child.  Grow up people.  I&#8217;m the one who should be bitter that my adoption didn&#8217;t go through:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angela</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4642</link>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4642</guid>
		<description>She never said I will quit working all togehter. She said at the  moment . She has more than 3 moths to do that. If you take a materniy leave from your work that will be about the same  time. Just leave her alone. She is doing her best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She never said I will quit working all togehter. She said at the  moment . She has more than 3 moths to do that. If you take a materniy leave from your work that will be about the same  time. Just leave her alone. She is doing her best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmdo1016</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4637</link>
		<dc:creator>dmdo1016</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4637</guid>
		<description>Angelina is a she-witch.  End of discussion.  I also see "V" bailed.  How shocking when faced with direct quotes that fans of Angelina's are left speechless.

SHE-WITCH!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angelina is a she-witch.  End of discussion.  I also see &#8220;V&#8221; bailed.  How shocking when faced with direct quotes that fans of Angelina&#8217;s are left speechless.</p>
<p>SHE-WITCH!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4608</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4608</guid>
		<description>Calling your GORGEOUS baby a "blob" is not exactly sensitive and loving.  Do you honestly think the baby doesn't know of her indifference?  She PROJECTS all these emotions on these children, who, in fact, have their own.  Loving children is extremely selfless.  I think Angelina is far too narcisstic for the job.  Thank God little Shiloh has her Daddy, who seems to adore her, as he (and her mother) should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calling your GORGEOUS baby a &#8220;blob&#8221; is not exactly sensitive and loving.  Do you honestly think the baby doesn&#8217;t know of her indifference?  She PROJECTS all these emotions on these children, who, in fact, have their own.  Loving children is extremely selfless.  I think Angelina is far too narcisstic for the job.  Thank God little Shiloh has her Daddy, who seems to adore her, as he (and her mother) should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4605</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 05:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4605</guid>
		<description>Oh yes Clarity, People magazine is pure evil and US Magazine is the last bastion of fine journalism. Give me a freakig break. While I do appreciate your pseudo-intellectual lecture on journalism (Edward R. Murrow is probably rolling over in his grave after reading your post), you are taking the side of a tabloid. A TABLOID. If you know anything about journalism as you seem to claim, you should know better than to take anything these tabloids say seriously. I do commend you for investing that much time and thought into something as important as a hollywood celebrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes Clarity, People magazine is pure evil and US Magazine is the last bastion of fine journalism. Give me a freakig break. While I do appreciate your pseudo-intellectual lecture on journalism (Edward R. Murrow is probably rolling over in his grave after reading your post), you are taking the side of a tabloid. A TABLOID. If you know anything about journalism as you seem to claim, you should know better than to take anything these tabloids say seriously. I do commend you for investing that much time and thought into something as important as a hollywood celebrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4604</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 05:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/03/29/angelina-jolie-not-committed-to-bonding-with-children-us-mag-says-what-many-are-thinking/#comment-4604</guid>
		<description>Oh yes Clarity, People magazine is pure evil and US Magazine is the last bastion of fine journalism. Give me a freakig break. While I do appreciate your pseudo-intellectual lecture on journalism (Edward R. Murrow is probably rolling over in his grave after reading your post), you are taking the side of a tabloid. A TABLOID. If you know anything about journalism as you seem to claim, you should know better than to take anything these tabloids say with a grain of salt. I do commend you for investing that much time and thought into something as important as a hollywood celebrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes Clarity, People magazine is pure evil and US Magazine is the last bastion of fine journalism. Give me a freakig break. While I do appreciate your pseudo-intellectual lecture on journalism (Edward R. Murrow is probably rolling over in his grave after reading your post), you are taking the side of a tabloid. A TABLOID. If you know anything about journalism as you seem to claim, you should know better than to take anything these tabloids say with a grain of salt. I do commend you for investing that much time and thought into something as important as a hollywood celebrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
