<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joan Van Ark: What Happened?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glosslip.com/2007/12/10/joan-van-ark-what-happened/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/12/10/joan-van-ark-what-happened/</link>
	<description>Celebrity gossip from our lips to yours</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 06:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mitsu</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/12/10/joan-van-ark-what-happened/#comment-18646</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitsu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/12/10/joan-van-ark-what-happened/#comment-18646</guid>
		<description>That picture is by far one of the scariest things I've seen. How anybody could willingly allow themselves to be photographed looking like that is unimaginable. I've seen it all over the internet and it's like looking at one of the faces of death or something. Just brutal. But that middle picture you posted interests me - I haven't seen it before. There also seems to be something really wrong in that picture as well. I mean, look at the skin on her chest and lower neck. It's all shiny and streaked-looking, like it's been stretched too tight (like her face) and is coming apart at the seams. It doesn't help that we can see all the bones in her chest cavity. She looks like a re-animated skeleton. All I can say is, going back to the first image, there is something seriously, drastically wrong with a person who thinks they look good or even presentable in this condition. And judging by the amount of makeup she's wearing (although, inexplicably she has no lipstick on when she really needs it), this is what she looked like AFTER prettying herself up!

Joan, it appears that you've already gone to hell for cruelty to your own skin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That picture is by far one of the scariest things I&#8217;ve seen. How anybody could willingly allow themselves to be photographed looking like that is unimaginable. I&#8217;ve seen it all over the internet and it&#8217;s like looking at one of the faces of death or something. Just brutal. But that middle picture you posted interests me - I haven&#8217;t seen it before. There also seems to be something really wrong in that picture as well. I mean, look at the skin on her chest and lower neck. It&#8217;s all shiny and streaked-looking, like it&#8217;s been stretched too tight (like her face) and is coming apart at the seams. It doesn&#8217;t help that we can see all the bones in her chest cavity. She looks like a re-animated skeleton. All I can say is, going back to the first image, there is something seriously, drastically wrong with a person who thinks they look good or even presentable in this condition. And judging by the amount of makeup she&#8217;s wearing (although, inexplicably she has no lipstick on when she really needs it), this is what she looked like AFTER prettying herself up!</p>
<p>Joan, it appears that you&#8217;ve already gone to hell for cruelty to your own skin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D-Bomb</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2007/12/10/joan-van-ark-what-happened/#comment-18425</link>
		<dc:creator>D-Bomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 04:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2007/12/10/joan-van-ark-what-happened/#comment-18425</guid>
		<description>holy cow!! she looks like a blonde version of michael jackson. maybe a little scarier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>holy cow!! she looks like a blonde version of michael jackson. maybe a little scarier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
