Comments on: Can Scientology REALLY Be This Weird?

By: terryeo lighfield

terryeo lighfield — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 02:20:01 +0000

Scientologist usually have filtering software installed on their computers to filter
out anything critical of scientology, even if it’s true, just google “scieno sitter”.
How can something that is so controlling provide any “answers to deeper questions” if it
can’t even be honest about itself?

By: Half Sigma

Half Sigma — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:20:35 +0000

“I find ALL of this plausible, except the part about Suri.”

The article didn’t say that she WAS the daughter of L Ron Hubbard, only that some Scientologists BELIEVE it.

If Scientologists can believe in Xenu, why not in artificial insemination?

By: Gustavo

Gustavo — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:06:06 +0000

Scientology saved my life. People should find out for themselves. Vested interests will pay people a lot of money to write things against their enemies. Chiropractors used to be maligned, vitamins used to be called dangerous. The idea that blood circulated in the body was heresy until the 1600’s. The press itself had to earn its respect.

Scientologists don’t think it’s OK to take advantage and control of people as occurs too often in this society. People should do a little research on the child protection racket. Scientologists don’t think it’s OK to take children from their homes, place them in foster care and then put them on 10 different psychotropic drugs, just because the parents would not. Or pay people to drug their children as an “incentive”, or threaten others of removal should they not place their children on drugs. Scientology has been fighting for human rights for decades.

Scientology is a simple religion. People like it because it helps them with their problems and helps them find answers to their deeper questions. If Scientology even came remotely close to the allegations that a certain few, I and many others would never be a Scientologist. So find out for yourself.

By: Gavin

Gavin — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:53:04 +0000

Maybe Tom is the ANTI-CHRIST

By: gina

gina — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:21:57 +0000

Morton again lost all credibility, taking the whole book out of tabloids

even the Eduardo cruz quote is false.
Crazy guy this Morton.

Of course Suri’s Tom and he may be very hurt, I hope he sue.

By: gus

gus — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:34:42 +0000

Nice try.

Except those who follow the Cult of the Dead Science Fiction Writer know this stuff to be true. HUNDREDS of Scientology escapees have already discussed most of these stories on the net.

All this does is take a small portion (doesnâ€™t even scratch the surface) of the lunacy that is L. Ron Hubbardâ€™s Scientology and give the public a glimpse.

By: Lu

Lu — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:00:26 +0000

Morton must be on drugs or something to invent such stories about Tom. I hope he will be sued to bankruptcy. Heâ€™s just a leech living off otherâ€™s fame. First he sucked out Princess Diana now itâ€™s Tom and Katie. The book is not being published in Britain because their libel laws require truth to be published. The US has good laws too, for example lies like the ones you list out here can be compensated with hundreds of millions of damages to be paid.