<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge To Britney Spears: Don&#8217;t Make A Federal Case Out Of It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glosslip.com/2008/02/20/judge-to-britney-spears-dont-make-a-federal-case-out-of-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glosslip.com/2008/02/20/judge-to-britney-spears-dont-make-a-federal-case-out-of-it/</link>
	<description>Celebrity gossip from our lips to yours</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:16:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2008/02/20/judge-to-britney-spears-dont-make-a-federal-case-out-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-25227</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2008/02/20/judge-to-britney-spears-dont-make-a-federal-case-out-of-it/#comment-25227</guid>
		<description>That title cracks me up, especially juxtaposed with that pic.

K isn&#039;t just insightful, she&#039;s a cut-up too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That title cracks me up, especially juxtaposed with that pic.</p>
<p>K isn&#8217;t just insightful, she&#8217;s a cut-up too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crazymom</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2008/02/20/judge-to-britney-spears-dont-make-a-federal-case-out-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-25224</link>
		<dc:creator>crazymom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2008/02/20/judge-to-britney-spears-dont-make-a-federal-case-out-of-it/#comment-25224</guid>
		<description>oops!  
By &quot;his spokesman&quot; I&#039;m referring to the spokesman of the publicity-seeking, ambulance-chasing, Jon Eardley and NOT Chief Justice Roberts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops!<br />
By &#8220;his spokesman&#8221; I&#8217;m referring to the spokesman of the publicity-seeking, ambulance-chasing, Jon Eardley and NOT Chief Justice Roberts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crazymom</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2008/02/20/judge-to-britney-spears-dont-make-a-federal-case-out-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-25223</link>
		<dc:creator>crazymom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2008/02/20/judge-to-britney-spears-dont-make-a-federal-case-out-of-it/#comment-25223</guid>
		<description>Bah!!!  PWNED is right!

Because the Federal Court System doesn&#039;t have enough to do with trying drug cases, terrorism cases, kidnapping cases, and Wesley Snipes&#039; tax evasion case.  Oh no, we&#039;ve got hundreds of district and circuit court judges just sitting around hoping for another election fracas so they can have something to do.

I&#039;m sure that Chief Justice Roberts has already asked the rest of his SCOTUS Justices to clear their calendars on the off chance that Britney-gate makes it all the way up to the hallowed halls of the highest court in the land.

Remember his spokesman is Michael Sands, so there&#039;s only two degrees of Kevin Bacon back to Oslimeball bin Loony.

I&#039;m no expert either, but would it be considered a violation of a person&#039;s civil rights if they were taken advantage of by publicity-seeking ambulance chasers while that person was not in complete possession of their mental faculties?

Sounds like we may have legal grounds to file a lawsuit against the guy who filed the lawsuit.  Quick, somebody call Jackie Chiles!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah!!!  PWNED is right!</p>
<p>Because the Federal Court System doesn&#8217;t have enough to do with trying drug cases, terrorism cases, kidnapping cases, and Wesley Snipes&#8217; tax evasion case.  Oh no, we&#8217;ve got hundreds of district and circuit court judges just sitting around hoping for another election fracas so they can have something to do.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that Chief Justice Roberts has already asked the rest of his SCOTUS Justices to clear their calendars on the off chance that Britney-gate makes it all the way up to the hallowed halls of the highest court in the land.</p>
<p>Remember his spokesman is Michael Sands, so there&#8217;s only two degrees of Kevin Bacon back to Oslimeball bin Loony.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m no expert either, but would it be considered a violation of a person&#8217;s civil rights if they were taken advantage of by publicity-seeking ambulance chasers while that person was not in complete possession of their mental faculties?</p>
<p>Sounds like we may have legal grounds to file a lawsuit against the guy who filed the lawsuit.  Quick, somebody call Jackie Chiles!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judge To Britney Spears: Donâ€™t Make A Federal Case Out Of It &#183; Britney Spears</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2008/02/20/judge-to-britney-spears-dont-make-a-federal-case-out-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-25207</link>
		<dc:creator>Judge To Britney Spears: Donâ€™t Make A Federal Case Out Of It &#183; Britney Spears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/2008/02/20/judge-to-britney-spears-dont-make-a-federal-case-out-of-it/#comment-25207</guid>
		<description>[...] Free Britney wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptIn a brazenâ€“but vainâ€“attempt to strip a probate court of jurisdiction before it could enter Orders extending the temporary conservatorship of Britney Jean Spears (â€Britneyâ€), an attorney without a client has purported to remove the &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Free Britney wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptIn a brazenâ€“but vainâ€“attempt to strip a probate court of jurisdiction before it could enter Orders extending the temporary conservatorship of Britney Jean Spears (â€Britneyâ€), an attorney without a client has purported to remove the &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
