Comments on: Germany Shows Consistent In Its Zero Tolerance Policy Towards Church Of Scientology, Shuts Down Kindergartern Run By CoS

By: beebee

beebee — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:43:21 +0000

Curiouser – your research is lacking…

” …CCHR nonsense such as the claim that ADHD was invented in 1987 simply to create a need for Ritalin. (Methylphenidate was patented in 1954, so inquiring minds want to know why it was invented 33 years before what it was supposed to treat. That is assuming that “inquiring minds” exist, of course…” – http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/comment/psychiatry.htm

And – to use your logic – how will you save a drowning psychiatrist when you want to obliterate them?

By: Curiouser

Curiouser — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:18:32 +0000

Anonime, Thank-you for your comments on ritalin. To learn more Google “psychiatry, psychotropics, lobotomies” where you will learn Scientology is hardly a lone voice against psychiatry’s use of psychotropics to treat anxiety, depression as well as ADD and many more made up “illnesses”. Yes, Scientologists will save a drowning psychiatrist regardless of matter how many children he has killed but they will also obliterate psychiatry.

By: Terryeo

Terryeo — Sun, 02 Mar 2008 23:04:09 +0000

Well I’m tired of you all. If you wish to debate me, you may visit me on Gaiaonline.com under the same name “Terryeo” or my other account “TerryeoTerryeo”. If you give me IRL Goatse, I’ll totally put ethics in.

By: Anoynymause

Anoynymause — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:08:14 +0000

Jeanne: All right, I’ll answer your questions, again:

1. No, GlossLip should not be changing its logo. As I’ve stated before, there’s about one Scientology article for every five standard gossip articles. That’s a 1:5 ratio, or about 83.333…% of articles NOT on Scientology. Does this make it an anti-scientology website? Not at all.
2. I’ll answer your own question (the one you made in #42) with a question on my own: why don’t YOU start answering OUR questions, instead of FOLLOWING the policies you’re defending?

How could David Mischaviege’s mother shoot herself three times WITH A SHOTGUN? Do you know how much force those things have?! unless she shot once in her stomach, CRAWLED to the fucking thing (that would be several feet away from her by then), and repeated the step twice, before doing it AGAIN to shoot herself in the head, it’s impossible!
Also, are you a Scientologist? Do you work for the Church of Scientology? Why won’t you answer these questions? What are your crimes?
You know damn well what your crimes are.
You are a disgusting individual.

By: dr3k

dr3k — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:04:34 +0000

once Germany found out about the rehabilitation project force it was basically doomed to never get religious status there.

By: beebee

beebee — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 01:31:06 +0000

Protest CO$ in your country. Get informed.

Best way to help is to educate the $cientologists. Stand outside their orgs, with placards and loudspeakers reading from their top secret ’scriptures’ – show them that no one is dying from respiratory illnesses as they read all about Xenu and ’special’ OT powers…

Offer them help in blowing.

They are scared, show them that you can help them escape.

By: anonime

anonime — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:31:48 +0000

Frank, you wrote:
“Too bad Scientology keeps going off the deep-end, because I liked their idea of not drugging every other child with Ritalin.”

There are other organizations and people who don’t believe in drugging every other child with Ritalin. If you don’t like that, I’m sure you can effect change with respect to it too. Scientology is not the only one who is against that.

By: Tina

Tina — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:17:39 +0000

There are obviously bad people running this cult.
People are getting hurt.
Children are having their best years stolen from them.
I am so happy GlossLip is exposing it all.
Thanks.

By: sillygrrl

sillygrrl — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:15:32 +0000

YEAH! All y’all are confusing me. I’m tired of apologizing due to impersonators.

By: Scott

Scott — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:03:49 +0000

I have to agree with D on this one. At least allow for a civil debate. Impersonating people is just likely to confuse newer people and it comes off as rather immature.