<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Amazon.com Censoring Negative Reviews Of Scientology Books?  Sure Looks Like It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glosslip.com/2008/04/10/is-amazoncom-censuring-negative-reviews-of-scientology-books-sure-looks-like-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glosslip.com/2008/04/10/is-amazoncom-censuring-negative-reviews-of-scientology-books-sure-looks-like-it/</link>
	<description>Celebrity gossip from our lips to yours</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:26:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GlossLip &#187; Tom Cruise Meets With Amazon, Now Amazon UK Pulling Scientology Expose From Site - Coincidence?</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2008/04/10/is-amazoncom-censuring-negative-reviews-of-scientology-books-sure-looks-like-it/comment-page-2/#comment-65093</link>
		<dc:creator>GlossLip &#187; Tom Cruise Meets With Amazon, Now Amazon UK Pulling Scientology Expose From Site - Coincidence?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/?p=3227#comment-65093</guid>
		<description>[...] form negative reviews disappearing about books written by Scientology found, L. Ron Hubbard. After exposing this apparent bias, readers informed us the negative reviews had reappeared, but only temporarily. What the status is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] form negative reviews disappearing about books written by Scientology found, L. Ron Hubbard. After exposing this apparent bias, readers informed us the negative reviews had reappeared, but only temporarily. What the status is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virginia</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2008/04/10/is-amazoncom-censuring-negative-reviews-of-scientology-books-sure-looks-like-it/comment-page-2/#comment-55469</link>
		<dc:creator>Virginia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/?p=3227#comment-55469</guid>
		<description>July 27, 08.  Dear everyone, I understand what is being said.  Let me give you a little about the experience I have had with Scientology.  I have been a Scientologist for over 30 years.  I am definitely a skeptic.  I do not follow anything or anybody blindly.  When I first found Scientology in the 70s, created by L. Ron Hubbard, I was surprised at how well the training routines (to help with communication) worked.  I had a particular problem with communication at that time and it has since resolved.  As I progressed, I got more specialized procedures and other problem issues also resolved.  I became more â€˜me&#039; the individual.  I became a success in my field.  I cannot speak for others, but I witnessed a change for the better in them too.  If you really want to find out about Scientology read the book â€˜What is Scientology&#039; or read â€˜Dianetics&#039;, (from Greek: DIA, through, and NOUS, mind or soul) or get the â€˜Dianetics&#039; video.  Whichever one you get you will find yourself on a fascinating adventure which will take you into the depths of the mind.  They are available at any book store, or Scientology Organization.  Since Scientology has expanded rather incredibly to international proportions, there are many Scientology Organizations all over the world available to you.  I really wish you all the success.

 

Virginia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>July 27, 08.  Dear everyone, I understand what is being said.  Let me give you a little about the experience I have had with Scientology.  I have been a Scientologist for over 30 years.  I am definitely a skeptic.  I do not follow anything or anybody blindly.  When I first found Scientology in the 70s, created by L. Ron Hubbard, I was surprised at how well the training routines (to help with communication) worked.  I had a particular problem with communication at that time and it has since resolved.  As I progressed, I got more specialized procedures and other problem issues also resolved.  I became more â€˜me&#8217; the individual.  I became a success in my field.  I cannot speak for others, but I witnessed a change for the better in them too.  If you really want to find out about Scientology read the book â€˜What is Scientology&#8217; or read â€˜Dianetics&#8217;, (from Greek: DIA, through, and NOUS, mind or soul) or get the â€˜Dianetics&#8217; video.  Whichever one you get you will find yourself on a fascinating adventure which will take you into the depths of the mind.  They are available at any book store, or Scientology Organization.  Since Scientology has expanded rather incredibly to international proportions, there are many Scientology Organizations all over the world available to you.  I really wish you all the success.</p>
<p>Virginia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill D</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2008/04/10/is-amazoncom-censuring-negative-reviews-of-scientology-books-sure-looks-like-it/comment-page-2/#comment-55179</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 03:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/?p=3227#comment-55179</guid>
		<description>I encountered another brand of censorship at Amazon, regarding Oprah Winfrey.  I was reading so-called reviews of one of her products (huge money-makers for Amazon of course).  Thing is, many of the reviews had nothing to do with the product but instead were homages to Oprah, the celebrity.  So seeing this, I figured it must be OK for me to write a review about Oprah, not her product, as well, except mine was going to be negative.  

I did so, and Amazon refused to publish it, saying the review must be about the product, not the artist.  Apparently they really meant, not about the artist unless it&#039;s something flattering and positive about the artist and will in no way threaten the millions of dollars we make off of said artist.  

I was stunned, to say the least.  This is clear and outright censorship, and the policy is total crap, especially since there&#039;s proof positive on the site that they don&#039;t follow any such policy.  I&#039;ve lost all respect for Amazon over this incident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I encountered another brand of censorship at Amazon, regarding Oprah Winfrey.  I was reading so-called reviews of one of her products (huge money-makers for Amazon of course).  Thing is, many of the reviews had nothing to do with the product but instead were homages to Oprah, the celebrity.  So seeing this, I figured it must be OK for me to write a review about Oprah, not her product, as well, except mine was going to be negative.  </p>
<p>I did so, and Amazon refused to publish it, saying the review must be about the product, not the artist.  Apparently they really meant, not about the artist unless it&#8217;s something flattering and positive about the artist and will in no way threaten the millions of dollars we make off of said artist.  </p>
<p>I was stunned, to say the least.  This is clear and outright censorship, and the policy is total crap, especially since there&#8217;s proof positive on the site that they don&#8217;t follow any such policy.  I&#8217;ve lost all respect for Amazon over this incident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hate Scientology</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2008/04/10/is-amazoncom-censuring-negative-reviews-of-scientology-books-sure-looks-like-it/comment-page-2/#comment-48675</link>
		<dc:creator>Hate Scientology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/?p=3227#comment-48675</guid>
		<description>What happened to freedom of speech? It seems that scientology doesn&#039;t want to listen to anyone but itself. It is a cult that targets the naive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to freedom of speech? It seems that scientology doesn&#8217;t want to listen to anyone but itself. It is a cult that targets the naive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ingrid</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2008/04/10/is-amazoncom-censuring-negative-reviews-of-scientology-books-sure-looks-like-it/comment-page-2/#comment-43363</link>
		<dc:creator>Ingrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 06:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/?p=3227#comment-43363</guid>
		<description>sluniverse is shit.  If you post there your rl info will be passed around in private messages.  The owner is a scammer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sluniverse is shit.  If you post there your rl info will be passed around in private messages.  The owner is a scammer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moar Scientology: In the News! - SLUniverse Forums</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2008/04/10/is-amazoncom-censuring-negative-reviews-of-scientology-books-sure-looks-like-it/comment-page-2/#comment-36108</link>
		<dc:creator>Moar Scientology: In the News! - SLUniverse Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/?p=3227#comment-36108</guid>
		<description>[...] long as we are on the subject, Amazon is deleting negative reviews of Scientology books. AGAIN.  GlossLip » Is Amazon.com Censoring Negative Reviews Of Scientology Books? Sure Looks Like It  Josh linked to an open letter about this a few months back. It&#039;s looking like the story is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] long as we are on the subject, Amazon is deleting negative reviews of Scientology books. AGAIN.  GlossLip » Is Amazon.com Censoring Negative Reviews Of Scientology Books? Sure Looks Like It  Josh linked to an open letter about this a few months back. It&#8217;s looking like the story is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2008/04/10/is-amazoncom-censuring-negative-reviews-of-scientology-books-sure-looks-like-it/comment-page-2/#comment-36090</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 04:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/?p=3227#comment-36090</guid>
		<description>http://scientologyanon.blogspot.com/

&quot;Open Letter to Amazon.com founder Jeff Bezos&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://scientologyanon.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://scientologyanon.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Open Letter to Amazon.com founder Jeff Bezos&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moar Scientology: In the News! - SLUniverse Forums</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2008/04/10/is-amazoncom-censuring-negative-reviews-of-scientology-books-sure-looks-like-it/comment-page-2/#comment-36071</link>
		<dc:creator>Moar Scientology: In the News! - SLUniverse Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/?p=3227#comment-36071</guid>
		<description>[...] long as we are on the subject, Amazon is deleting negative reviews of Scientology books. AGAIN.  GlossLip » Is Amazon.com Censoring Negative Reviews Of Scientology Books? Sure Looks Like It  Josh wrote an open letter about this a few months back. It&#039;s looking like the story is starting to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] long as we are on the subject, Amazon is deleting negative reviews of Scientology books. AGAIN.  GlossLip » Is Amazon.com Censoring Negative Reviews Of Scientology Books? Sure Looks Like It  Josh wrote an open letter about this a few months back. It&#8217;s looking like the story is starting to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AF</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2008/04/10/is-amazoncom-censuring-negative-reviews-of-scientology-books-sure-looks-like-it/comment-page-1/#comment-35955</link>
		<dc:creator>AF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/?p=3227#comment-35955</guid>
		<description>&quot;It just really annoys me seeing the LMT brought up as that appears to be Scientologyâ€™s tactic du jour. â€œHey look, someone might have lied sometime, so anonymous people are lyingâ€.&quot;

There&#039;s a word for that, it&#039;s called &quot;a cult operating in a glass house being stupid enough to throw stones.&quot;  My God, in the McPherson case itself Scientology lied by insisting over and over and over that they had not put Lisa on the Introspection Rundown -- and then turned around and made it a cornerstone of their case.  As for Hubbard, my God, what DIDN&#039;T Hubbard lie about:  lied about being a nuclear physicist instead of a college dropout, lied about being a war hero instead of a malingerer and bungler removed from duty for incompetence more than once, lied about healing himself from war wounds that he never suffered and from athritis and bursitis that he continued to draw disability pay for for years afterwards.  As for the CoS, let&#039;s not forget the Big Lie they told, trying to frame Paulette Cooper for bomb threats.  The minute they bring up the issue of &quot;who&#039;s credible&quot; they have painted a big fat bullseye right on their own vulnerability.  &lt;b&gt;Hit them hard.&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It just really annoys me seeing the LMT brought up as that appears to be Scientologyâ€™s tactic du jour. â€œHey look, someone might have lied sometime, so anonymous people are lyingâ€.&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a word for that, it&#8217;s called &#8220;a cult operating in a glass house being stupid enough to throw stones.&#8221;  My God, in the McPherson case itself Scientology lied by insisting over and over and over that they had not put Lisa on the Introspection Rundown &#8212; and then turned around and made it a cornerstone of their case.  As for Hubbard, my God, what DIDN&#8217;T Hubbard lie about:  lied about being a nuclear physicist instead of a college dropout, lied about being a war hero instead of a malingerer and bungler removed from duty for incompetence more than once, lied about healing himself from war wounds that he never suffered and from athritis and bursitis that he continued to draw disability pay for for years afterwards.  As for the CoS, let&#8217;s not forget the Big Lie they told, trying to frame Paulette Cooper for bomb threats.  The minute they bring up the issue of &#8220;who&#8217;s credible&#8221; they have painted a big fat bullseye right on their own vulnerability.  <b>Hit them hard.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitsu Too</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2008/04/10/is-amazoncom-censuring-negative-reviews-of-scientology-books-sure-looks-like-it/comment-page-1/#comment-35770</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitsu Too</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/?p=3227#comment-35770</guid>
		<description># 48 David I concur. I guess they got tired of the nazi/psych arguement eh? I think they also know that the LMT Minton affair does drive a wedge in the old guard critics even though Minto and Brooks have absolutely nothing to do with the anons. I wonder what they now will do with the Belgian affair?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 48 David I concur. I guess they got tired of the nazi/psych arguement eh? I think they also know that the LMT Minton affair does drive a wedge in the old guard critics even though Minto and Brooks have absolutely nothing to do with the anons. I wonder what they now will do with the Belgian affair?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
