Targeted Boston Anonymous Member Gregg Interviewed By WGBH Boston
I have been reluctant to talk further about Gregg of Boston simply because there was so much controversy about his charges, his person and his past. I felt it was best to remain neutral. Part of the issue was related to my being aware that he had some extenuating circumstances in his past and I didn’t want to be the one to draw any attention to this, simply because I didn’t know the nature of what happened. Now that it was revealed, and was in fact, NOT some sort of dangerous, violent crime I feel even more compelled to raise awareness to Gregg’s plight.
Clearly this young man was targeted simply because of a weakness in his background and because he was brave enough to put his name upon official documents so others wouldn’t have to. I encourage all of those in the critical community who are following this story to watch this interview with Boston’s WGBH, and I am now even more convinced of how dangerous the Church of Scientology is.
They will find your every weakness, any vulnerability in your past or even those close to you and seize upon this to make you go away, sometimes forever. I’d say ask Lisa McPherson, but since she’s dead, you can’t.
Gregg, good luck. Please keep us up to date on any developments.
(hattip: Mitsu2)
Pink Stripe WordPress Theme Designed by Joni Mueller &
Church? Religion? Parishoners? PLEASE people of the media…these words do not apply here. This is a cut- throat bottom line business that wastes bodies and whatever else it needs to survive.
Comment by Jack — April 25, 2008 @ 9:26 pm
dont forget that they also utilise and strongly enforce the policy of suppressing suppresive people.
its not fair game. thats bad pr. lets just call it suppressing the suppressives.
shit. those two needed to bring moar!.
honestly. i would have busted out a flier and started reading from it.
spread awareness about the fucking cult. not just try and bullshit and pussy foot around the place. YOUR ON TV! UTILIZE THE SITUATION PUT THAT STUPID SCILON SHARK DOWN AND SPREAD AWARENESS!
Comment by Lord Ceptimos — April 25, 2008 @ 9:43 pm
Because they identify as a religion we are supposed to bow down and allow them any number of greased pathways in and around society? Because it is a “religion” I should respect it outright!!! NO. I don’t think so. This cult like any other-the Catholic Church, Moonies, Hare Krishnas, EST-requires scrutiny and tough digging into their goings on.
Comment by Jack — April 25, 2008 @ 10:32 pm
Had the Anonymous entered the Church without masks would the Church of Scientology not have persecuted them?
Comment by Anonymous — April 25, 2008 @ 11:04 pm
Um. Excuse me. The Catholic Church is not a cult. It is, historically, the first ecclesial body of Christendom.
Lumping the Catholic Church in with Hare Krishnas, etc., betrays a great deal of ignorance.
Comment by Clayton — April 25, 2008 @ 11:12 pm
While I agree that Gregg& Tom could have said more, just them being there, has opened them up to more threats from The Co$.
Anons everywhere, are proud of you! For being so brave to face this jackal on TV-(Co$ lawyer). I truly believe that these two gentlemen carried themselves with dignity and respect, and were clear of their-(OUR) non-violent, non-threatening intentions. We wish to educate and help, bring light to the dangers of untested psychological query, help those scientologists that are afraid to leave, have free thought and those who cannot speak to their friends and family anymore.(Disconnected) And to shed light on the obvious FAIR GAME policy still in operations. Thanks D, you rock!
Comment by anon4eva — April 25, 2008 @ 11:22 pm
[…] D is a wealth of unprecedented information. The last post on Targeted Boston Anonymous Member Gregg Interviewed By WGBH Boston is highly regarded. Here’s a brief overview: […]
Pingback by Boston Senior Living Communities and Retirement Homes » Blog Archive » Targeted Boston Anonymous Member Gregg Interviewed By WGBH Boston — April 26, 2008 @ 12:01 am
Wow! First off, Emily Rooney get’s an A on this edition of her show. Nest, Gregg and Tom did great presenting the facts! I am sorry that Gregg is forced to take on this burden because he was the permit holder. I hope he is able to appeal the case and I hope it does not effect his probation as the cult would want.
Scientology came across as arrogant and vindictive and essentially foolish. That was scientologist IAS donations $$$ at work. Pathetic.
Thanks Dawn! Another terrific report from Glosslip.
Comment by Mary McConnell — April 26, 2008 @ 12:27 am
Thanks to Glosslip “the whole world’s watching”.
And that’s all it takes: a little light shined in the right places.
Comment by marcab — April 26, 2008 @ 12:49 am
The thanks goes to Dawn. She’s the one who has done all the hard work to get these stories out. She’s done a great job at it, too.
Comment by k — April 26, 2008 @ 12:51 am
Aw mang, that lady who was doing the interview seemed to be on the side of Anon… if only Tom and gregg had seized more opportunities to spread the knowledge!
Also, that lawyer stated that Anonymous claimed responsibility for sending Anthrax to the Church, and was not rectified — wtf?
Comment by Anoynymause — April 26, 2008 @ 2:40 am
you are awesome dawn
thanks so much for your courage and effort
Comment by LaNon — April 26, 2008 @ 3:04 am
this guy is one of the number of peopple been “fairgamed” by a so called religious organization
with mobsters ,criminal organization practice
these guys in the church of $ilentology
are sometime “border line” and “dangerous” they get mader the more the end is near
let’s all be careful about the “squirrrels” $cientologists
they might be out of control
I wish I could be anonymous I am not I am a french clown been fairgamed bt this “cult”
and watch behind me everytime by now
“may the farce be with us”
Comment by nono la patate — April 26, 2008 @ 3:58 am
amazing. just proof of what they do. that lawyer even seemed nervous, and kept repeating the same bs over and over.
Plus they claim they were intimidating their parishoners…I find it funny how all the things the “Church” itself does, they turn around and say other people do.
Ignorance will be the downfall of this organization…and the downfall has already begun.
Kudos on posting this Dawn
Comment by AnonFreedomInTruth — April 26, 2008 @ 5:00 am
LRH ED 149 INT, 2 Dec 1966, “Branch 5 Project, Project Squirrel”
“7. If we do the above as our pattern, we will successfully bring the following facts into public consciousness:
(a) People who attack Scientology are criminals.
(b) That if one attacks Scientology he gets investigated for crimes.
(c) If one does not attack Scientology, despite not being with it, one is safe.”
Fu** that. This is there tactic to scare people. The Co$ has far worse crimes.
Comment by Sarit from Israel — April 26, 2008 @ 5:12 am
[…] Targeted Boston Anonymous Member Gregg Interviewed By WGBH Boston Posted in fair game, video by Temple of Xenu on the April 26, 2008 Via glosslip […]
Pingback by Targeted Boston Anonymous Member Gregg Interviewed By WGBH Boston « Temple of Xenu — April 26, 2008 @ 6:33 am
That lawyer has got to be a Scientologist himself. And if he’s not, then he’s just a horrible human being…. And if he is in fact a Scientologist, he may well in fact be a horrible person, nontheless - it all depends on how much he is brainwashed and/or being blackmailed.
Comment by Ron Brown — April 26, 2008 @ 6:11 pm
I’m pretty sure the lawyer is a hired gun, not a Scientologist. He is a former member of the Boston city council.
Comment by Ron Newman — April 26, 2008 @ 9:24 pm
I too was surprised that the Scilon lawyer was allowed to get away with two very big untruths in one sloppily phrased sentence — one, that “anthrax” had been sent to the Church of Scientology (a provable falsehood) and two, that Anonymous was responsible (we certainly would have heard if the FBI’s investigation had found any support for that theory.)
Then I realized who the woman interviewer in the video was and was amazed that Anonymous got even that fair of a hearing. That was Emily Rooney, who, after the NC Attorney General had determined that there was no credible evidence of the attack alleged to have been committed by the Duke lacrosse players, after the district attorney Mike Nifong was disbarred for ethical violations, after Nifong was jailed for his crimes — Emily Rooney still asserted that “We don’t know what happened in the Duke case. We never will. … Something happened.” I think Gregg is lucky that she didn’t decide “well, Scientology is making so many accusations against Anonymous, some of them must be true… Gregg, you did something illegal.”
Comment by AF — April 27, 2008 @ 10:54 am
[…] Housh, of Boston, is known to them because he filed the protest permits against the CoS in Boston: GlossLip Targeted Boston Anonymous Member Gregg Interviewed By WGBH Boston Their lawyer sued him for trespass and harassment last week because he entered their building to […]
Pingback by Should I worry? - Enturbulation.org Activism Forums — April 27, 2008 @ 8:59 pm
It’s such a complicated topic, it’s a shame they had so little time to discuss it.
I’m particularly pissed that the lawyer wasn’t stopped on that “anthrax” BS. Press a fucking charge, get the FBI to make a statement, do ANYTHING to prove this or GTFO!
Also, agreement to hold a hearing isn’t a conviction jackass! And how does a copyright law violation indicate violent tendencies!?
That aside I think the anons held up fairly well. Hopefully this gets others to do a little research and see the truth.
Comment by YourpersonalSP — April 28, 2008 @ 4:59 am
Just in…
from Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly:
Scientology case headed to BMC
http://www.masslaw.com/042808news.cfm
Comment by Sponge — April 28, 2008 @ 5:00 pm
does scientology in Boston have a visible no tresspassing or no soliciting sigh posted if not the Court should throw the suit out immediately. Has Gregg tried to contact Graham Berry
Comment by judy — April 29, 2008 @ 12:48 pm
soorry for the typo sih is supposed to be sign. God Bless
Comment by judy — April 29, 2008 @ 12:49 pm
[…] (Hat Tip: GlossLip) […]
Pingback by CarnivUL of The fraudless: exposing the CULT « The Frame Problem — April 29, 2008 @ 5:34 pm
as an experiment, someone needs to go hand out flyers promoting Judaism in a church.
I doubt they will be sued for harassment.
Comment by anonthermous — April 29, 2008 @ 11:50 pm
So his main argument is that we wear ski masks and that ‘guy fock’ masks which mean nothing…
also if you would go into a Christian church with masks on to hand out flyers criticizing Christianity, you would not be likely to go to court. They wouldn’t like it, and you’d be asked to leave, but not taken to court. And you wouldn’t hto be wearing masks in the first pace.
Comment by legionnaire 148 — May 12, 2008 @ 1:55 pm