Phillipine Red Cross Distributing Church Of Scientology Propaganda Materials
On the Church of Scientology’s shiny new YouTube Channel, where they are getting special privileges which other users are not privy to (sort of like their special tax exempt status), is a video where a member of the Phillipine’s Red Cross is bragging about distributing “religious material.” Surely Christian, Muslim, Buddhist or Hebrew groups would like that kind of arrangement.
A call has been placed by a member of Anonymous to the Red Cross here in the United States. So far, it’s a surprise to them.
Why do I have a feeling YouTube and the Church of Scientology are going to be less than thrilled with the outcome of these two entities teaming up to suppress free speech and promote suspicious religious agendas?
Pink Stripe WordPress Theme Designed by Joni Mueller &
First!
http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&FORM=LMLTCP&cp=pn4nry57j156&style=b&lvl=1&tilt=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&scene=12009869&phx=0&phy=0&phscl=1&encType=1
There is a bird’s eye view of gold base. Can you see Katie Holmes undergoing sea org training? No, but it would be cool.
If you google Giveusallyourmoneyology and the phillipines, you can see they are quite active there, with their “ministers” etc.
here’s my humble little question… why do they use a crossed out cross, call themselves ministers, call their sunday “listen to L Ron” sessions ‘Services’, yet… uhm… no Jesus.
It’s because they aren’t a christian church, yet try to visually appear to be one. I’m not super religious, but… seems like the ol’ wolfs in sheeps clothing/false prophet type scenario.
Comment by Bif Nerded — April 30, 2008 @ 11:10 pm
The “Cross”: more fraudulent behavior.
Its all lies.
Its a trap.
They say you can be any religion, but they soon take away any religion you had.
All religions were implanted in the souls of those blown up in the volcanoes, by forcing them to watch 3-D movies, according to L.Ron Hubbard.
Hmmmm, doesn’t sound like a false god to me, or maybe…..
Comment by marcab — April 30, 2008 @ 11:28 pm
D stand for Duh
Comment by A — May 1, 2008 @ 12:48 am
ew. the fact that they are slowly infiltrating the phillipines is disgusting to me. it makes me sick.
putan ina! they still dont know how to pronounce our words either!
MANDANAO?!?!?!?!?!?
ITS MINDANAO!!!!
fail! speaker is fail!
ontop of that. this just shows that we need to truly spread the world throughout the world.
not just home. we need to spread global awareness on a higher scale.
Comment by Lord Ceptimos — May 1, 2008 @ 12:08 pm
Between google’s censorship, in essence, of the internet in favor of communist China, and it’s censorship of Mark Bunker on youtube, even while taking gobes of advertisement money from the church of scientology, a dangerious cult, it’s getting harder and harder to look at google as something even remotely positive. I think the question is raised of whether google has torn up its prior mission statement that it will “not be evil.” Certainly, google and youtube have displayed a great deal of arogance toward the public, basically, challenging them to even try to do something about its evil behavior. The response I received to my complaints from youtube have been a circular joke.
Comment by AnonymousNow — May 1, 2008 @ 2:01 pm
OY MGA REPAPEEPS! Pag na movin ny culto namin sa bansa mo, bibili ako ng manga bata sa Rojas. Yung hindi masyadong matanda. Gusto kung isaksak sa pwet.
“Bhoy! Bayad kana! Wag kang pumalag!”
Comment by Terryeo — May 1, 2008 @ 11:06 pm
Sorry one-eyed, I meant to go in and bleep out your combination of words, and I deleted it instead. Feel free to repost minus a string of harsh sentiment. I want Scientologists to feel comfortable commenting here. I want to help them, we should all want to help them.
Remember, much of the Old Guard were once Scilons, and I like those people.
Comment by D — May 1, 2008 @ 11:37 pm
How do you tell a thirsty horse that he is thirsty? How do you tell an illiterate man that he is illiterate. How do you tell a person, yeah, you’ve got memorized knowledge, but you can’t use it because you don’t understand it. That, Glosslip author and commenters, is the actual situation. You have knowledge, you can repeat what other people have told you. But you don’t understand it, you can’t use it effectively. Why do I say this? I say this because there is a philosophy that bridges that gap, that is founded on that gap, whose whole effort is to bring personal knowledge into personal understanding. That’s the definition that L. Ron Hubbard gave for Scientology on March 3, 1952 when he introduced the word.
Comment by Terryeo — May 2, 2008 @ 11:38 pm
A thirsty horse already knows that he is thirsty. An illiterate man knows he is illiterate. Repeating knowledge to someone who already knows something well isn’t using knowledge effectively, its wasting time.
How can knowledge be used effectively, rather than simply be repeated or reiterated? The dissemination of knowledge is the initial goal, as knowledge held only by a single person is useless compared to knowledge shared by all.
Understanding comes from gathering all the information you can, and using that knowledge to make an informed assessment on the topic. The more you know, the better you can understand. The problem with not having the entire picture is that an incorrect assessment can be made without all the information available. Also, any information should be critically evaluated to determine it’s validity.
I’ve tried to look at all the information that I have available to me. Statements from anonymous, from scientology, from the press, from its parishoners, from its critics, from television interview, news reports, books, blogs, photos, youtube documentation, and court records. The more I study this subject, the better informed I become and the greater the understanding of it I achieve.
I have seen scientologists who are greatly uninformed about a particular subject, speak at great lengths with great conviction, or flat out deny something that has been proven beyond the shadow of a doubt to have been taking, or is taking place. I’ve seen scientologist claim that organizations such as narconon, applied scholastics, CCHR are not part of the CoS, and at the same time the CoS claim the successes of these organizations as their own.
Personally I would love to see the church ‘reform’ or simply change their ways in these matters. For years they claim they’ve ‘cleaned house’ of the troublemakers when they refer to the problems they’ve had in the past. Unfortunately each time they ‘clean house’, they’ve reverted to the same frightening tactics as before, without showing or explaining what has changed. Nor have they ever shown remorse for any of the people who have been hurt or killed by Scientology.
I’ve come to understand that the ‘church’ of scientology, has systematically stripped its members of their basic human rights, and the first thing they seek to strip, is the freedom of thought.
Lying about something doesn’t make it true. “What’s true is what’s truth for you”, doesn’t make something right. It just gives people an excuse or cause to believe something that is flat out false. You can tell a horse all its life, “you’re a zebra”, but that doesn’t make it true. It’s that black and white.
Comment by Fawkes News — May 4, 2008 @ 9:35 am