“Struck” The Film, Celeb Scientologists Team Up For Romantic Comedy
This movie may or may not be good, I won’t make a judgment call on that as I haven’t seen it. The cast reads like a who’s who in Scientology, Jenna and Bodhi Elfman, Helena Christensen, Kelly Preston, Nancy Cartright (huh, WTF?), Marisol Nichols (married to producer Taron Lexton) — all Scientologists, the writers, Milena Ferreira, her husband Nathan Lorch, Scientologists, and it’s being financed and produced by, you guessed it, a Scientologist, Taron Lexton.
The romantic comedy starring Bodhi Elfman, is about a man who is struck by an arrow which doesn’t harm him, but he can’t remove it either. Interesting….
I guess that’s ok, the Church has been colluding with industry insiders for years to take over Hollywood, why not just come out and be obvious about it. I wonder though, did they cast only Scientologists because it’s so good they didn’t want to share, or because these people can’t get work elsewhere because Hollywood, mainstream America and the world at large are sick of Scientology and their star roster forcing their faith down our throats via Tom Cruise, John Travolta and Kirstie Alley.
The films been premiering at film festivals, including one in Newport Beach, CA. yesterday. If anyone’s seen this, please feel free to give us your review. I can’t impugn the work of the actors, they’re all good in their own right. I can however impugn their judgment in not looking more closely at their chosen faith and asking some tough question.
Good luck with the new film CoS shills, I hope it doesn’t SUCK.
Pink Stripe WordPress Theme Designed by Joni Mueller &
Comprehensive list of scientlogists in (or working on) this movie, with links to their reported scientology service completions, here..
http://ocmb.xenu.net/ocmb/viewtopic.php?t=26356
Comment by Sponge — May 1, 2008 @ 12:36 pm
This film is seven precious minutes of your life that you’ll never get back.
Time better spent wanking, methinks.
Comment by David Mudkips — May 1, 2008 @ 2:38 pm
I’m attempting to understand a media person’s thinking. First, you have public topics. Then you seek the most alarming ways, ways that might create fear, anger or even direct harm. And you present public topics in ways that rouse fear, or at least trepidation. Did I get that straight?
Comment by Terryeo — May 1, 2008 @ 2:47 pm
“seek the most alarming ways, ways that might create fear, anger or even direct harm”
far from what WiseGlossGirl does!
I call this BS as you’re the only one seeing anything that way = cause you’re a scientologist, right?
you have your opinion, she can have hers
go away
Comment by tuffyt — May 1, 2008 @ 3:02 pm
Give up Terryeo, youre known now and no one with two working brain cells beleives either you or the criminal cult for which you work. Your sunk…take a deep breath and go down with the Tradewinds…
Comment by Centurian 10 — May 1, 2008 @ 6:41 pm
you know what I find alarming and what creates anger in me? That you can come to a site (as a $cientologist) that is successfully keeping people in the loop on what’s going on in the world,and give your opinions and play the martyr…wheres my right to do that on any of “your” sites..answer me that
Comment by Libraesque — May 1, 2008 @ 7:37 pm
“Then you seek the most alarming ways, ways that might create fear, anger or even direct harm. And you present public topics in ways that rouse fear, or at least trepidation.”
Ah, somewhat like what you got banned from Wikipedia for?
Comment by AF — May 1, 2008 @ 8:52 pm
lol.. why judge these actors by what they do in their personal time?? o wait tts what this site is for.. losers!
Comment by k — May 13, 2008 @ 4:20 am