Comments on: Nicole Kidman Wants Her Teenage Kids OUT Of Scientology – Cruise De Facto Head Of Scientology

By: EVERYONE HERE SUCKS

EVERYONE HERE SUCKS — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:45:20 +0000

GO TO HELL, ALL OF YOU!!! YOU ALL SOUND LIKE FAITHFUL FOLLOWERS OF HITLER, WITH YOUR ANTI-SCIENTOLOGY BASHING, YOU’RE NO DIFFERENT THEN NAZIS BASHING JEWS!!! IF YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND THE RELIGION, THEN READ UP ABOUT IT, DUMBASSES!!! DON’T JUST ASSUME IT’S A CULT BECAUSE YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND IT!!!! NICOLE DOESN’T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT HER KIDS, IF SHE DID SHE WOULD BE MORE INVOLVED IN THEIR LIVES, TOM DOESN’T PREVENT HER FROM DOING THAT!!! SHE ONLY CARES ABOUT HER BIOLOGICAL CHILD, AT LEAST TOM LOVES HIS KIDS ALL THE SAME!!! WHY DO YOU THINK THEY CALL KATIE MOM, BECAUSE NICOLE ISN’T A MOTHER!!! ALL THE NO-GOOD, IDIOT NICOLE CAN DO IS SIT THERE AND GET PLASTIC SURGERY AND LOOK LIKE JOAN RIVERS AND CONSTANTLY COMPLAIN ABOUT NOT MOVING ON FROM TOM!!! I USED TO FEEL SORRY FOR HER, BUT NOT ANYOMORE!!! SHE BASHES PEOPLE WHO SHE SEES HAVE TRUE HAPPINESS, IT’S NOT TOM’S FAULT IF SHE HASN’T MOVED ON, SHE SAYS SHE STILL LOVES TOM, THEN BASHES HIM THE NEXT!!! WHAT A TWO-FACED B**CH!!!

By: Sally

Sally — Sat, 10 May 2008 00:38:30 +0000

Have you submitted the form?

The other option you have is don’t use Adsense.

By: SlG

SlG — Mon, 05 May 2008 21:37:38 +0000

During the Oprah interview, she asked Cruise something about him keeping the kids away from Kidman but the whole subject wasn’t elaborated on too much. I kind of missed part of it and went to her website to read the slideshow/transcript to see what I missed and there is nothing about it in the slideshow/transcript. Very strange….

By: Capcom

Capcom — Mon, 05 May 2008 18:54:07 +0000

That’s what I was thinking Joanie. A- Timing on a lot of points could have been germane to expressing her wishes. B- Too true, they can pay any idiot to leak a secret to the tabloids about her, and no one would know where it came from. Lots of us would guess, but overall it would be typical tabloid info of unknown origin that could hurt her feelings or her family’s.

By: k

Mon, 05 May 2008 18:13:09 +0000

#34 is right. There are some ads that AdSense puts on here that I personally would ban, but you can’t. If you mention a keyword, it bases ads according to that keyword. There’s not a lot we can do about it, other than submit a form to AdSense requesting certain things not show up, but even that is a crapshoot…it’s up to them, not us.

The other day, I did one article on Roger Clemens (I’ve since done another one). Based on that one article there were baseball ads on here. I’ve mentioned church, and get Protestant church related stuff. For a while there, all we had were Britney Spears ads.

And from what I understand, you don’t get anything unless people actually click the ads. I would say most of the people who come here are too smart about the CoS to actually click one.

By: Anon

Anon — Mon, 05 May 2008 17:57:43 +0000

Sally, it doesn’t work like that. If you use AdSense ads, it works like a lottery roller with different colored balls and a magnet drawing certain balls that are referenced often to the top. If you talk about red balls a lot, it’s going to draw red balls to the top. If you talk about Scientology a lot, it’s going to draw Scientology to the top. If you talk about waterfront property, it’s going to draw waterfront property to the top. That’s how it works, and nobody is allowed to be choosy with it.

By: Sally

Sally — Mon, 05 May 2008 16:47:26 +0000

If you are so against Scientology why can’t you either ask AdSense to block Scientology adverts or not use them for your advertising.

If you’re going to crusade against something I think it is a bit rich to take cash which is paid for by advertising for the same thing – don’t you?

By: Joanie

Joanie — Mon, 05 May 2008 07:36:21 +0000

Isn’t it possible that Nicole hasn’t been brave enough to publicly denounce Co$ and attempt to get the kids out? Isn’t it possible she was waiting until they were a little older and could handle the sort of attention a battle like this might entail?

And as far as the knowledge gained in auditing, Co$ wouldn’t have to be the entity spreading the news, they could get leak it anonymously to any number of press groups.

By: danny

danny — Mon, 05 May 2008 05:18:06 +0000

Those defending Scientology here should google “scientology disconnect policy” and do some reading.

By: JohnnyD

JohnnyD — Mon, 05 May 2008 01:42:09 +0000

These comments have got to be some of the most messed up I have ever read. By the time I got to the end I decided the article as well as the comments were nothing but gossip based on very little truth. Also, IMHO their family matters are nobody’s business and from what I have read don’t see that either Tom or Nicole have been neglectful with their adopted children.

Though it may be untrue, I have heard that both Nicole and Tom had both completed OTIII and then both became inactive for a few years after they split with Tom continuing on some time before he got together with Katie. As far as I know Nicole never became declared SP by the CoS and as I understand one has to do more than become inactive to become declared SP, which BTW apparently would have become a huge problem regarding the kids. According to some people, saying something like “I want to get my kids out of Scientology” could have gotten her declared suppressive and whether this would do it or not, I strongly doubt she actually said it simply because she would have known this could have made it very difficult for her to get the kids out. I also have a problem with the accusation of the Church blackmailing people to stay in the church. I for one would have told them to go right ahead no matter what crimes I had committed or how famous I was, because their doing so would damage the CoS far more than it would me.