Comments on: Angelina Jolie Checks Into Hospital In Nice, France, Holy Births Imminent!

By: Maclean

Maclean — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:25:34 +0000

Some people are just too delusional to even be allowed on the internet. Ms. Vajranagini (now there’s a delusional name if there ever was one) clearly lives in a world of her own vision – seeing things she wants to and refusing to see things she doesn’t want to.

For reasons all too clear to those of us of an advanced age and with real life experience women like Angelina Jolie tend to bring out the worst in some women. They think they “know” her and everything about her when obviously they don’t. Everything she does is allegedly evil and selfish and wrong. A look in the mirror is what is needed for these women. But mostly they just need to grow the eff up and stop trashing other women. Until you can walk in her shoes you don’t know her.

By: Dog gone crazy

Dog gone crazy — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:22:50 +0000

Sarah # 14, Prostituting grave issues of the third world to gain publicity [It's called exploitation] is worse than wearing a t-shirt mocking an ex-wife.

By: Vajranagini

Vajranagini — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 03:38:15 +0000

Oh, and HERE’s a link to the pic of her with the belly over to the SIDE..please note the FLATNESS below her bosom where a BELLY should be…and how Zahara is actually STRADDLING it on her hip!

http://justjared.buzznet.com/gallery/photos.php?yr=2008&mon=05&evt=jolie-edge&pic=brad-angelina-the-edge-02.jpg

By: Vajranagini

Vajranagini — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 03:11:10 +0000

Believe me, SHE’S NOT PREGNANT. This is a GIANT FRAUD being perpetrated for massive PR coverage, not to mention massive payoffs for the ‘exclusive”. And all this for the price of a few prosthetics, just like the ones she has worn in her movies! The photo evidence of her with her everchanging bump, and most particularly the pic of her with her belly on sideways, not to mention those FAKE “bikini” shots on the balcony (all PHOTOSHOPPED; the one of her with the towel is an OLD SHOT from 2002)provides sufficient proof for anyone with a functional discriminative capacity to see what’s going on. Add to that the fact that she’s keeping her PREGNANT ASSISTANT Holly close by(shouldn’t she be back in the USA with her HUSBAND???)suggests that it is HOLLY who will be ‘giving birth”, and this hospital hoo-ha is probably about HER and NOT Jo-LIAR!

It is certainly NOT a stretch to imagine that HOLLY is the SURROGATE for Mangy’s alleged “twins”; I mean who cares about a personal assistant? Is anyone from the tabs going to investigate whether or not HOLLY will return to the USA with her OWN child(ren), or with NO kids but instead a BULGING BANK ACCOUNT full of HUSH MONEY? I certainly HOPE SO!!!

By: Danielle

Danielle — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 01:38:58 +0000

Bravo!!!!!!!! And way overdue. Now if other people will just open their eyes to the BS party. Don’t count on them going away. Attention wh0res are like serial killers. The thrill wears off and they have to do it again.

By: Sarah

Sarah — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 23:49:51 +0000

So at least we all agree on one thing: Julia Roberts is scum of the earth. (well, maybe I shouldn’t speak for anyone but myself). Can’t believe she would ever be invited on Oprah, the Oscars, or anything else after such behavior.

Anyhow, I suddenly remember hearing she was offended that Brad Pitt did not want to get involved with her when they starred in some movie together. If that is true, I’m not surprised – Brad has good taste! Have loved him since Thelma and Louise.

Though, don’t think I’ve seen much of anything he’s been in since…

By: Rachel

Rachel — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:45:14 +0000

“I donâ€™t recall specifically what made me dislike Julia Roberts in the first place”

The “A Low Vera” shirt did it for me. Seeing the video of her and her nasty-tempered husband parking in a clearly marked handicapped spot didn’t help.

I boycott anything she’s in. I also won’t pay to see Jolie’s movies, I think she’s an awful “actress”. And of course ANYTHING in which a $cientologist appears is off limits. No wonder I rarely go to the movies.

By: Exyank

Exyank — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 08:17:31 +0000

So, if Brad hadn’t done “Mr and Mrs Smith” he and Jennifer Aniston would still be happily married and making babies of their own?

That’s the implication with the word “homewrecker”.

Perhaps I feel strongly about this (though I don’t feel strongly about Angelina Jolie one way or the other) because I was in a very bad and shaky marriage when I met my now-husband. He didn’t wreck anything. The home was falling down around my ears and when the dust cleared, he was still standing there, so I went with it.

It really kind of irritates me to see people immediately assume that anyone in a bad marriage had their “home wrecked” if they end up with someone they met while still married.

Frankly, I don’t know what happened between Angelina and Brad or between Brad and Jennifer, but neither does anyone else, so why go out of your way to make assumptions of wrongdoing and adultery?

By: Jx2

Jx2 — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 04:04:59 +0000

Personally I am opposed to large families. My approach is from an ecological standpoint. More children means more diapers in landfills and more food required to feed a growing population. The world’s food source is rapidly diminishing hence the introduction to GMO type foods. I also think that by focusing on religion as an excuse for harvesting large families, the big picture is being ignored. Religion in general, breeds ignorance on many levels…there would be less problems in the world.

By: Sue

Sue — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 02:25:45 +0000

#15 ME EITHER!!!:)