GlossLip, Celebrity Gossip From Our Lips To Yours

07/15/2008 (1:41 pm)

Nicole Kidman Not Really Into Pimping Out Her Kid

FINALLY…a celeb who isn’t into whoring out their kid for cash and who ISN’T a Scientologist.  And I’m pretty sure Nicole won’t ever get sucked into the cult.  Nicole Kidman and hubby Keith Urban don’t plan on selling pics of little Sunday Rose, at least not for now:

While pics of Knox and Viv Jolie-Pitt are already being shopped for upwards of $15 million, the couple from Oz say they’re going to give the first snaps of their tot out for free, according to the Sydney Morning Herald.

“They don’t think it’s appropriate to make deals,” says a source. “They are still deciding how they feel about (it).”

Yes, make the right decision.  Don’t waver.  I was beginning to despair that there was anyone left who didn’t want to follow in the footsteps of Jamie Lynn, Jennifer Lopez, Nicole Ritchie, Christina Aguliera, and Brad and Angelina (yeah, they donate the proceeds to charity, but it’s still photos of a baby, big deal).

I’ve never been a big fan of Nic, but with this revelation I’m starting to like her a bit.  Now if she can just manage to get that ex of hers to hand over some mommy time with her other two kids.  You know, and get them to stop calling her by her first name.

Posted by k
Filed under: Aww, Babies, Nicole Kidman

6 Comments

  1. [...] every light side, there is a dark side.  Just after writing about Nicole Kidman possibly deciding to give away her baby photos for free (like every other mom), I read that actress [...]

    Pingback by GlossLip » However, Jessica Alba Goes Ahead And Sells Baby Pics — July 15, 2008 @ 2:10 pm

    2.  

  2. It’s a stupid move. And naive. If you’re Nicole Kidman you HAVE to “whore” the baby pics. Then you can make sure the money goes to somewhere appropriate like the kid’s trust fund or a charity like Angelina Jolie. Otherwise, every freaking paparazzo and shopper with a cell phone camera is going to ungracefully stalk them and snap a pic of the kid and cell it for millions for dollars to Star Magazine. Yeah, that’s not a good alternative.

    Worst case scenario, you end up like Michael Jackson, always shrouding their kids wherever they go, obsessed about beating the public media .

    Comment by david — July 16, 2008 @ 1:52 am

    3.  

  3. I CANT STAND KEITH URBAN OR NICOLE KIDMAN. PEOPLE SAY THAT NOW SHE WILL DRAG OUT HER VOICE NOW.

    Comment by JOANIE — July 16, 2008 @ 12:57 pm

    4.  

  4. Keith and Nicole will, in good time, release an official picture of Sunday Rose. They did after all release an official wedding picture, and it kept the photogs at bay. They are a private couple and don’t embarrass themselves to solicit media attention.

    Nicole Kidman has a lovely singing voice, she did her own singing in Moulin Rouge. As for Keith Urban, I suggest Joanie go to one of his concerts. He is an incredible musical talent.

    Comment by Madi — July 16, 2008 @ 5:18 pm

    5.  

  5. I just wished she would spill the beans about everything! You know what I’m talking about! We want to know what happened and how the “church” manipulated her and blackmailed her from her auditing sessions.

    Comment by tuffyt — July 17, 2008 @ 8:35 am

    6.  

  6. [...] See more here: Nicole Kidman Not Really Into Pimping Out Her Kid [...]

    Pingback by celebritycelebrities.com » Blog Archive » Nicole Kidman Not Really Into Pimping Out Her Kid — October 4, 2008 @ 6:43 am

    7.  

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.