David Miscavige, Tom Cruise, BFF and Ever and Ever
What do you call two short dudes, dressed in leather who believe their bodies are infected with alien spirits?
There’s no punchline, I’m just at a loss as to what to call the sheer queerness being exuded from these two weirdos. And I mean queer in the classic sense of the word.
Well, it’s good to know that Tom Cruise hasn’t alienated all his friends. His best buddy David Miscavige, leader of the Church of Scientology is still in his corner. No, seriously, I think the guy sleeps in the corner of Tom Cruise’s bedroom and watches him sleep. I’ll bet Katie really enjoys the subtle nuances of their “bro-mance.”
Image courtesy of IDLYITW via Enturbulation.org.
Pink Stripe WordPress Theme Designed by Joni Mueller &
Why do they believe their bodies are posessed by aliens? Xenu.net. Educate yourself.
Comment by Anonymous — July 26, 2008 @ 11:59 pm
hahaha! DM looks like he permed the top of his hair, lol! By the way, are they wearing the same sunglasses, too? Too funny, Dawn.
Comment by Mary McConnell — July 27, 2008 @ 4:57 am
So much for Tom distancing himself from scientology. If he thinks he can rehabilitate his career and so publicly be seen with its leader he has no hope in Teegeak of doing so. His PR people must be birthing kittens and shitting bricks everytime he does this. Buh Bye Tom. When the shit hits the fan you’d better not be standing too close to David. It’ll be hard for you to plead ignorance of the criminal activity surrounding your BFF.
Comment by Mitsu Too — July 27, 2008 @ 7:00 am
Is there a woman on earth who still finds the Cruiser attractive? I cringe every time I see his face, and I’m sure I’m not the only one.
And on a lighter note, while shopping the other day at a large chain store I noticed many of his movies are now residing in the bargain bin. And not just 1 or 2-there were approx 8 or 9, all selling for a whopping $6.99. Right next to such timeless stars as Pauly Shore and Paris Hilton.
Perhaps when the tiny one is finally put in an orange jumpsuit he and Tommy will be allowed the occasional conjungal visit.
Comment by Rachel — July 27, 2008 @ 8:24 am
Are they wearing their medals of valor?
I hope Cruise’s staff does a laundry check after one of Miscavige’s sleep-overs. You can’t tell from the photo, but Miscavige is probably wearing a pair of Tom’s soiled underwear. It is part of their shared “powerz.”
Katie is at home with her purple hands, busy turning baby Suri purple too.
Comment by Harriet Luna — July 27, 2008 @ 8:43 am
Does Tom know about how DM physically abuses his followers?
See Jeff Hawkin’s story.
What an a-hole that DM is.
This looks BAD, Tom.
PS I don’t find him attractive anymore, for sure.
Comment by tuffyt — July 27, 2008 @ 9:12 am
Little men, big egos.
Comment by Gradyman0 — July 27, 2008 @ 10:10 am
Sir. X
OT’s. SF
Chapped assholes. LFBD F/N
Comment by Gerry Armstrong — July 27, 2008 @ 11:19 am
what about XENU????
the only subject it doesn’t exist but you’re not supposed to talk about it ????
I remember this girl in NYC last winter saying
“there’s not such a thing”
“such thing like xenu you mean ??”
“I don’t loose my time on these things ”
then
keep holdin’ the cans babe throw away your money get rid of your bt’s
WWWW.XENU .NET educate yourself about the cult
Comment by zorro — July 27, 2008 @ 11:25 am
Doesn’t DM look old and weary in this picture? I hope Anonymous is getting to him…
Comment by Anonymous Beezwax — July 27, 2008 @ 11:40 am
That shot is really formidable! they look indeed quite bizarre to avoid a more bizarre qualification.
thanks for having shared!
Comment by roger gonnet — July 27, 2008 @ 11:56 am
Scientology points out methods to understand. The Lulz is, you’re dissing what you don’t understand.
That example “Believe in (alien) spirits” is a Lulz because there’s no belief. It is about understanding what you know, not believing what you read. A very funny Lulz indeed.
Other examples of understanding what you know include study technology and examining one’s memories in an auditing session – understanding what you can recall.
And this is a reason why critics words have little effect. None of Scientology is memorized knowledge, there is no specific passage that you can wield as a weapon against it. Because for a scientologist, it is all about understanding such passages, understanding the passage within its context. And you can’t get that from stolen documents.
Of course this posting will only fuel critics, not bring any understanding. On the other hand, the weather is good, our planet is large and life abounds
Comment by Terryeo — July 27, 2008 @ 12:07 pm
Terryeo, Terreyeo, wherefore art thou Teryeo?
A steaming pile of queerness by any other name still smells the same, eh? That is my understanding.
But, oh advanced one…please,please help me understand about your little midget COB punching people in the face regularly? How do you understand that? And holding people against their will? Ah, never mind, you’ll just lie.
How is all that lying as a way of life working out for you, anyway? Is it all you hoped for when you signed up?
You just made me think of something really, really sad. If you use study technology would you have to word check Shakespeare? Damn, tragic that would be. Another crime to add to the list.
And I notice you forgot to say that the world is beautiful…maybe because they took that away from you. Beauty, I mean. And replaced it with “the tech”.
Damn, Tragic.
Comment by jane — July 27, 2008 @ 1:23 pm
Their leader looks like that? Wow. He looks like a bar fly.
Comment by cups — July 27, 2008 @ 1:23 pm
Poor, poor Terryeo. Always going on about misunderstandings and explaining it all away as if it is all an illusion. Us poor uninitiated wogs, we are too dumb too understanding the meaning of the words. Only scientologist hold the key and power. If it’s treu for you then it must be true, never mind that the house is on fire all around you. See this is the problem Terreyeo. You think that the whole world is wrong, only scientology has it right. Here is a word for you. Excrement, feces, doo doo, cahcah, crap, poop, merde, excreta, bull droppings, cow patties, manure and shit. There are many more I am sure. Regardless of all the differing word it still comes out of one’s asshole and everyone has no problem understanding it’s purpose. It would be far easier to take you seriously if scientology had not ruined your critical mind in such a way as you are entirely incoherent in your written commentaries and as such all we see is bull shit. Yet I am sad for you as you believe in your own delusions thanks to scientology and persist in thinking that everythng outside of your scientology world is wrong. Hey daydream believer wake up and smell the coffee!Terryeo whoever you are you need to stop believing the bullshit you’ve been fed because the day of reckonning is coming sooner than you think.
Comment by Mitsu Too — July 27, 2008 @ 3:10 pm
Wow.The Scientology leader looks like he’s been hitting the bottle!
Comment by andy d — July 27, 2008 @ 3:26 pm
Terryeo, thank you for that wonderful demonstration of a $cientologist’s communication skills. You have said it all, which is to say you have said nothing.
Comment by Neteret — July 27, 2008 @ 3:35 pm
That’s two comments saying Miscavige looks like a) a bar fly and b) like he’s hitting the bottle. There are claims on Xenu.net that he indeed is having a nip now and again. Half a bottle of expensive liquor a day. Not a lot by some standards but keep in mind his relative body size. At his height that’s like a full bottle for most people. So he’s a violent, abusive, hard drinking bloke who treats his most devoted members like they’re his common-law wife in a trailor park (as in smack them around and make it their fault that he has to beat them).
I like how his hair looks slightly bleached on top where it’s curly. Who wears the chaps in that relationship? — Mr Binks
Comment by Mr. Binks — July 27, 2008 @ 3:42 pm
Terryeo, I don’t see how the evidence against your cult’s criminal nature can be justified by the context of hubbtard’s ramblings.
No, really Terryeo, just what in his writing, justifies your cult’s behavior? Is there a particular passage that we are failing to put in context that addresses that issue?
I mean, what would you have us understand? That all of this is just part of some kind of conspiracy by the “merchants of chaos” to keep people from the truth? That your cult has the only possible solution to all the problems in the world and all the documentation on the cult’s criminal history is just part of this conspiracy to keep us all from knowing just how peachy keen $cientology is?
Orly?
Comment by liz — July 27, 2008 @ 4:03 pm
“They were like glue, two little people who really enjoyed each other. They laughed the same and acted the same. They were like glove puppets, he was a big star and he was head of a religion.”
-Jesse Prince, from “Tom Cruise, An Unauthorized Biography”, by Andrew Morton
Comment by glove puppet — July 27, 2008 @ 4:35 pm
Tom Cruise is a homosexual…the pictures on his site prove it.
Comment by anonymous — July 27, 2008 @ 4:53 pm
Terryeo, every time I read one of your inane comments or something posted by another of you fellow OSA shills or read some stupid promotional piece or article put out by your so-called ‘church’, many braincells are brutally and mercilessly slaughtered by the sheer idiocy and nonsense of the language.
I should sue the COS for negligent homicide.
And your doing it WRONG.
Comment by A Watcher — July 27, 2008 @ 5:12 pm
why do they need ear plugs? Isn’t damage just thetans?
discuss
Comment by anon — July 27, 2008 @ 8:27 pm
Wow, seeing DM in the sunlight like that is frightening.
Comment by Anon — July 27, 2008 @ 11:30 pm
Please… before they lose any more hair: matching mullets. I mean, aren’t they due for a comeback(mullets, I mean, not Tom and Napoleon)?
Comment by XenuOnIce — July 27, 2008 @ 11:53 pm
Does anyone know where this photo is from?
Comment by SgtAl — July 28, 2008 @ 2:43 am
DM is fun-size fail.
Comment by lol! — July 28, 2008 @ 10:06 am
It’s the antichrist and his bitch from Revelations!
Comment by tuffyt — July 28, 2008 @ 10:18 am
Terreyeo or anyone in scientology who feels that they can think critically about concepts. Let me throw out a supposition or two for you to ponder.
First, I tell you to expect a special feeling when my program works and then put you through a form of therapy (talking) designed to make you experience past trauma. Then, when you experience intense emotion, you begin to believe me and i couple that with a phrase like “What is true is what is true for you”. Then i tell you what to believe: “I cured you of a past experience”. Now your brain is telling you that i was right about the feeling. That experience was something you truly felt, therefore it must be “true”. I told you that i cured you, so that must be what you felt because i was the one who told you it would happen. So now in your mind, it is true to you that you are cured. You will keep that stance and be quite possibly cured as long as you believe i tell you the truth and as long as you want to maintain our good relationship.
You see, this is how it CAN WORK. This is one example of brainwashing. Brainwashing can be done to yourself and others and it can help a person overcome a painful experience. However, when the person doing the brainwashing chooses to exploit the person through this technique, it is dangerous and malicious.
The church of scientology is such a malicious source. They charge money of the victim. They recruit the willing into slave labor groups. They destroy the liberties of free speech by targeting speech they don’t like. They are trying to destroy the profession that can describe how they hurt others.
If you are looking for the same kinds of “wins” without the cost, without the forced volunteerism, without the hassle — then look into NLP. This is a similar technique you can use to “cure” yourself in much the same way but without someone holding secret files on you, hounding you, or hurting you.
When you cure yourself, there is no need for endless “sec” checking and bankrupcy.
-reason
Comment by Reason — July 28, 2008 @ 10:29 am
They (Cult of $cientology) are trying to destroy the profession (Physchiatry) that can describe how they (Cult of $cientology) hurt others.
PROFOUND OBSERVATION IS PROFOUND!!!!!!!!
Great point Reason!
Comment by tuffyt — July 28, 2008 @ 11:05 am
Hey Hey, keep thoes good articles coming Dawn, from the sounds of it we aren’t too far away from something big. If anyone has been stalked, harassed, or fairgamed, remember to check out Boris Korczak on youtube he tells you how to get your case on file with the FBI for the mass filing on CoS starting & rolling.
Comment by Theta — July 28, 2008 @ 12:05 pm
I think it’s odd how close TC is leaning into DM while Katie Holmes is more distanced. Body language says everything!
Comment by Anonymous — July 28, 2008 @ 4:16 pm
Oooh, that hair! Looks like li’l Davy had some turban renewal done. And yeah, he sure does look haggard in a badly facelifted sort of way, but then again, massive paranoia will do that to you. But enough ad hominem attacks for now . . .
Terryeo, you might gain some perspective by reading “A Prescription for a Superior Existence”. It’s fiction, but just barely. Very gripping and the best description of cult induction I’ve ever read. Click thru to my url for a review . . . or not.
Comment by Artoo45 — July 28, 2008 @ 7:50 pm
THere is much more interesting news concerning Tom and aliens in The Omniverse Almanac. Search Google for The Omniverse Akmanac or go to http://www.extramarbles.com
Comment by JP — July 28, 2008 @ 8:37 pm
Yawn…you’re all idiots.
Comment by Jeannie — July 29, 2008 @ 12:48 am
I wonder if Tom got a chance to read next months Maxim Magazine… Great article on page 108.
Comment by dennys — July 29, 2008 @ 2:56 am
And a bunch of sickotic impotees will criticize anything that’s different from what their hippie value-challenged parents, dope-dealing shrinx, and pot-lulled friends tell them to believe.
After all, you wouldn’t want to miss that chance to spend yet another week unconscious in Ritalinland. Good luck with the chicks, too!
If you think Tom is influenced, take a look at the last time you had an original thought that wasn’t fed to you by a hyperlink.
You criticize height, hair and sun-glasses? What third-grade puny-brained morons you are. Either of these guys works circles around you, have better vocabularies, and have obviously accomplished more in a couple of decades of round-the-clock hard work than you will ever accomplish watching reruns of Shatner-era StarTrek and seeing who can quote the most lines from ET while ripping off honest companies with your software from Pirates Bay.
The only thing wrong with you is J-E-A-L-O-U-S-E-E!
You know you’ll never accomplish 1% of what either of these guys have done, so your only slight refuge from total ignominy (buy a dictionary) is to jeer and play the fool for each other.
The great part about it is that you will create NO EFFECT on the world. Create no good software, devise no imaginative circuitry, write no good songs, build no organizations, carve no statues.
You will all think you are creating something by degrading something. I giggle knowing your lasting legacy will be a large, empty zero. (Yes, that’s redundant, but so are you.)
Comment by Haley'sComment — July 29, 2008 @ 3:24 am
Jealous? You’re an idiot.
Comment by tuffyt — July 29, 2008 @ 9:48 am
Where is Shelley Miscavige?????
Comment by nugs — July 29, 2008 @ 11:47 am
Woo, boy. I’m going to have fun with this one.
And a bunch of sickotic…
Skreeeeeeeeee! Let’s put the brakes on right here. LOLWUT? I’ve never seen this word and neither has the dictionary. It wouldn’t be so bad if not for the fact that, later in your comment, you arrogantly tell us to buy a dictionary. Well, which one: The Scientology one or the one for sane people? At any rate, I can assume you meant: psychotic. Wait, I think I get it now; anything beginning with psych, you change to sick. How clever.
…impotees will criticize anything that’s different from what their hippie value-challenged parents, dope-dealing shrinx, and pot-lulled friends tell them to believe.
Hrm, where to start? Well, there’s the obvious (second) word that doesn’t exist (impotees). But, let’s overlook that for now.
You made a lot of assumptions in that statement and certainly look like an ass for it.
But, I digress; my parents raised me in a Christian household. We went to church once on Wednesdays and twice on Sundays. However, they raised me to find out for myself what I should believe. As a result, I’m agnostic and my parents still accept me (i.e. they didn’t disconnect from me).
I’ve been to “shrinx” and gone through therapy. Never once was I offered “dope”. He did recommend I see a psychiatrist (the ones that can prescribe meds) who wanted to put me on Paxil. I said I’d rather not as I saw it as a crutch that didn’t really get to the root of the problem…he said ok and we continued on.
And, finally, some of my friends smoke pot, yes, but I don’t and not one of them (or anyone, for that matter) tells me what to believe. They’d be the last one of my friends I’d take at face value anyway. They smoke pot, after all.
After all, you wouldn’t want to miss that chance to spend yet another week unconscious in Ritalinland.
I took Ritalin as a kid. It made me more hyper. Mom stopped giving it to me. AD(H)D is over-diagnosed, we get it, but some people actually need (for lack of a better word) it to focus.
Good luck with the chicks, too!
LOLWUT?! Thanks, I have a beautiful girlfriend. I’d show you a picture but you’d probably get caught masturbating to it and get sent to the RPF.
If you think Tom is influenced, take a look at the last time you had an original thought that wasn’t fed to you by a hyperlink.
Well, let’s see…I wrote about 5 songs, acted as creative director in 2 photo shoots, and created a banner for someone’s web store in the past 3 weeks…does that count? That’s just some of the things I did in my spare time. I didn’t mention the cover band or my full time job. But, then, we’re all slack-jawed, pot smoking, Star Trek nerds who don’t know what it means to work.
You criticize height, hair and sun-glasses? What third-grade puny-brained morons you are.
“Third grade puny-brained morons” is what you call someone immediately after criticizing their immaturity? By the way, it would’ve been “puny-brained, third grade morons”. Slow down when you rant; you’re starting to look like the moron.
Either of these guys works circles around you…
See above, oh King of Assumptions. Plus, I’d hardly qualify pretending to be someone else as “hard work”.
…have better vocabularies…
Wait, the two High School dropouts in the picture up there? Doubt it. Although, Tom did bring back “glib”.
…and have obviously accomplished more in a couple of decades of round-the-clock hard work than you will ever accomplish watching reruns of Shatner-era StarTrek and seeing who can quote the most lines from ET while ripping off honest companies with your software from Pirates Bay.
Wow. The pile of assumptions gets bigger. I hate Star Trek, saw ET once, and the Pirate Bay is ok at best.
The only thing wrong with you is J-E-A-L-O-U-S-E-E!
Uhm, jealousy?
You know you’ll never accomplish 1% of what either of these guys have done, so your only slight refuge from total ignominy (buy a dictionary) is to jeer and play the fool for each other.
What about organizing world-wide global protest against a crime syndicate posed as a religion? That’s a pretty big accomplishment. What do we have to be ashamed (bought that dictionary) about? We shed so much light on what’s wrong in Scientology that the whole world is catching on.
The great part about it is that you will create NO EFFECT on the world.
Uhm, have you read the uncensored news regarding this? You’re too late. Effect is in motion.
Create no good software, devise no imaginative circuitry, write no good songs, build no organizations, carve no statues.
You do realize that the hacker youth tends to grow up and become software security experts. They grow up to write the protocols that keep your computer safe as you peruse the Scientology approved list of websites and carry on your LEAF-like campaigns.
As for the others, I’ve written good songs. I’ve been in bands that toured the country and received airplay on tons of radio stations.
Anonymous has built the ultimate non-organization and achieved more in 6 months than you would’ve liked and anyone would’ve guessed. Anonymous is being studied by top ad firms because of the massive success of our monthly protests. Get a clue and get a grip.
And, carve a statue? Yeah, I did that in Ceramics 101.
You will all think you are creating something by degrading something.
We are. It’s called change. To borrow your statue carving reference, consider Scientology a large block of granite. Anonymous is chipping away at it, hoping that, in the end, something of value is left. However, if the block is structurally unsound and streaked with impurities, the next strike of the hammer and chisel might reduce the block to dust.
I giggle knowing your lasting legacy will be a large, empty zero. (Yes, that’s redundant, but so are you.)
And I giggle knowing you’re a smug, pompous, arrogant, condescending, self-righteous, self-satisfying (you got your thesaurus handy?), petty, little pawn who doesn’t even realize he’s caught up in a game he can never play. You’ll be relegated to your position as a pawn your whole life. We’re players in our game. We are at cause. We are your OTs. And, we aren’t going anywhere.
Comment by Anon, Anon, My Boyfriend's Back! — July 29, 2008 @ 12:08 pm
AAMBB, Very nice line-by-line refutation. -reason
Comment by Reason — July 29, 2008 @ 1:03 pm
I swear, almost every time a scientologist responds, it is practically incoherent.
Seems like they got ripped off, isn’t the first thing they hook you with is telling you that you will be able to communicate with anyone at anytime?
Comment by tuffyt — July 29, 2008 @ 1:11 pm
Scientologists, please don’t stop, though.
Having the dark appear shows the light!
Comment by tuffyt — July 29, 2008 @ 1:12 pm
Terryeo, #12 response….
Terryeo does not BELIEVE that aliens exist
Terryeo KNOWS that aliens exist.
ummmaintthatriteterryeo?
Comment by ugh — July 29, 2008 @ 2:50 pm
Wow, AAMBB; sweet!
Haley’s Comment – please keep coming back. That was absolutely hilarious and I needed a good laugh !!!
::wipes tears from corners of eyes::
Comment by nonni — July 29, 2008 @ 4:28 pm
Wow, I think that we have valid proof here of what L.R.Hubbub’s made-up-word-Scientology-psychobabble-terms have done to the spelling skills of long term Scientologists. Whew.
Comment by Jannah — July 29, 2008 @ 4:44 pm
Thanks, Reason. Lately I’ve abstained from “lashing out” like that, but this guy/girl was really asking for it. I mean, if you’re going to be all high and mighty like that, you might as well spell correctly and make sense.
Oh, and Haley’s Comment? Why do you lack the confront to deal with the real issues? Why don’t address the allegations against your Church? Or, attempt to defend the recent actions and behavior of your fellow Scientologists?
Why do we, instead, find you here, fielding the small fries? I know why: because you have this big, fancy dictionary full of all these big, impressive words but no reason, rationale, or wit with which to use them.
Here’s one for you:
Truly effective communicators speak to their audience.
Of course, you aren’t an effective communicator. Hell, you aren’t even an effective shill. I’d venture to guess that, outside of Scientology, you aren’t an effective anything.
There. Can we be finished with talking down to eachother and start some real communication or should we continue?
Your move.
Comment by Anon, Anon, My Boyfriend's Back! — July 29, 2008 @ 4:54 pm
Thanks, everyone, but I feel like I should say that not all Scientologists act like this. If you check out Jim Warren’s comments here
http://glosslip.com/2008/07/14/church-of-scientology-orgs-caught-demonstrating-extremely-poor-behavior/#comments
you’ll see that, some of them are effective communicators and even capable of being open minded.
Comment by Anon, Anon, My Boyfriend's Back! — July 29, 2008 @ 4:59 pm
Jim Warren never answered my questions.
Comment by tuffyt — July 30, 2008 @ 8:48 am
tuffyt,
About how much he spent? Well, he isn’t an OT so it probably wouldn’t be a lot. Plus, that may be sensitive information to him. Besides, I’m not sure what it would prove at any rate since we all know the Scientology courses are expensive. Of course, you may have been going somewhere with the question so, feel free to ask him again and maybe explain why you want to know.
Comment by Anon, Anon, My Boyfriend's Back! — July 30, 2008 @ 10:39 am
thanks, I might.
I guess I was just hoping if he answered, he would see how wrong it was to pay for “church doctrine”.
Wishfull thinking, huh?
Comment by tuffyt — July 30, 2008 @ 1:50 pm
IF their honest goal is to save mankind from itself and
IF they believe the tech is a way to save mankind, they would give it away for free.
Comment by 34mezzo — July 30, 2008 @ 2:28 pm
bingo!
Comment by tuffyt — July 30, 2008 @ 2:34 pm
Power Comes From Knowledge of The Enemy
Ronbot is a pejorative term for some or all followers of Scientology. The term is a pun on Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard’s first name and the word robot.
The term Ronbot is meant to express the habit of Scientologists of being so programmed with the “Tech” that they can’t express their own viewpoints on life, because that has been suppressed and prohibited of them from doing so.
The Ronbot never doubts any thing he is told by staff, never investigates, never thinks beyond what he is told, never seeks to know more than he is permitted to know, never refuses to turn on his family, never reads what he is told not to read, never refuses to hurt the feelings of his family, never refuses to kill the love he had for his family, never doubts PTS or SP data, never seeks other ways to heal any symptom, never wonders why he is so fanatical and why? Never wonders why he hates SPs, and is willing to kill for the tech. Never refuses to hurt, damage or harm an SP, never doubts he is superior to us, never refuses to obey his masters on staff, etc.
Ex-scientologists view a Ronbot as a brainwashed Robot, since he can’t ever leave the Tech and express his own view points.
His reading material, his TV viewing and his interpersonal relationships and what he says and the way he talks, are closely monitored by other Ronbot Staff. If they discover that he went out with or talked with an SP and read material from Anti-cult websites, he is in deep trouble and must now face an ethics review.
He in fact does not have his own viewpoints, but just thinks so. His mind is so flooded with the Tech that to speak to, associate with, date or love a person who is classed as an SP is instant insanity (drastic down-tone slide) and he will be classed by the Cult as a “risk” or PTS.
Remember this fact—that all true Ronbots have a weak mind and spirit. They are actually very willing to be a slave of the Tech without question.
In the CULT OF SCIENTOLOGY YOU HAVE NO CONSTITUTION RIGHTS SUCH AS FREE SPEECH – you are told what to think, do and say. Your actions, your friends your relations, your books, and everything else you can think about is RESTRICTED to their approval.
YOU ARE NOT A FREE MAN OR WOMAN ABLE to do as you please at home, read what you please at home, your home TV set has a little censorship lock on it placed there by the cult to keep you inline.
Even your thoughts and innermost secrets are investigated and if they are considered wrong or un-approved by your ETHICS OFFICER you are taken (scammed) for more money.
The Ronbot was told that “suppression is illness and illness is suppression”, therefore he thinks that all illnesses come only from suppression or a PTS condition.
Remember that Ronbots are told that “all illnesses to a greater or lesser degree are due to only a PTS condition”. Any illness or symptom makes a Ronbot turn on anyone he was near in the past 72 hours. He is programmed to believe that his Mother or Father now is a Monster called a“SP” or “Suppressive Person.
He is never given the facts on “symptom re-stimulations”. He is never told about it being a physiological reaction, he is never told that all symptoms and illnesses are physiological reactions and that some symptoms can be re-stimulated by stress and arguments. And that symptoms are never the same for all; because every one has different deficiencies and different levels of toxins in their body, that will bring out a different symptom each time he is argued with.
Remember this one fact that Scientology rejects—“symptoms are not illnesses!” But Ronbots are never taught the true causes of real illnesses, and are trained to despise their parents when they get a symptom of a real illness. Symptoms can be re-stimulated by many real causes of illnesses even by stress—which in the cult is accepted by the brain-washed ronbots as “suppression”.
Scientology NEVER teaches Ronbots that symptoms are really physiological reactions of all life on Earth.
A physiological reaction is an effect of some cause. The real causes of all illnesses produce the symptom.
They use this brain-washing about symptoms, in order to control them and make them hate whoever opposes the cult.
In his weak brain-washed mind, he can’t ever accept that legal and illegal drugs, chemicals, parasites, toxins, toxic plants, mutated foods, Nuked (irradiated) Foods, or poisonous animals or insects, poisons, viruses or bacteria or over acidity etc., are the only and true causes of illnesses in the world. His mind rejects these well known facts as SP propaganda.
When he faces you in the street—he can’t see you, he can only see what is programmed into his brain-washed head. To him, you are the SP monster who is no better than his SP father or SP mother he turned his back on and now hates and/or distrusts.
He is not free to think for himself–therefore he is a ronbot.
It is senseless to argue with a Ronbot—he needs de-programming—he needs to be told he is a Robot and that he can’t pull the plug and reset his brain. Do not confront a Ronbot the old way – just pity him and dare him to talk with you about how Physiological Reactions are connected to study tech.
Dare him to have a friendly conversation with you—the more of a Ronbot he is – the more he will be afraid to go to ethics for daring to talk with an SP.
The cult will threaten any person with total exposure of all their confessed sins and secrets, if you dare leave, EXPOSE or confront them. That is the weapon that controls ALL CELEBRITIES, PROFESSIONALS AND COWARDS. The weak have given up their soul and now find that it will be made public knowledge.
The programming that he has received will force him to ask for your sins and secrets. He sincerely believes that you are against the Cult ONLY because you have sins of omission and commission.
Explain to him that he has sins and secrets too and that you would like to know his first, since he brought up the issue first. But don’t ask to hear them as a treat or condition to talk with him—if he refuses to give you his own sins and secrets—let it pass as long as he is willing to talk with you.
Do not argue with or insult a Ronbot, talk with him in a polite way even if he disgusts you. Arguments are commercial Controversies and make you lose the game. Get him to identify who he is and found out if he has property or a website. He if is connected to any website that libels and slanders your actual name on it—he just made you rich.
Then hire a Private Investigator to find out who owns or runs the website. Write them and accept all their attacks on your name for value. Start the UCC method to counter-attack them and take them for all they own.
Know this for a fact. — His brain is not his anymore. He can’t be proactive and dare to talk with a person who he was told is a MONSTER. But if he dares to talk and you only ask questions and never argue with him. He will begin to doubt and you know what happens to him after he is in the Condition of Doubt.
He is as evolved as a snail-or he was one in another life. In this life, he consented to be a mind-slave. Just dare him to read and dare him to talk with any anti-cult person on a friendly basis for at least one hour—dare him to get to know you–by then after that hour he is now a damaged ronbot to the cult—he won’t be trusted and now he is on his way to freedom from control.
For you to defeat the “Church” of scientology you must expose these truths about how Ron discovered Study Technology.
Once you put this NEW DATA into his brain, he is now damaged goods and is no longer a Ronbot, but a suspected PTS person never to be trusted again by the Cult.
To save a RONBOT BRAIN you must deprogram it with NEW DATA.
Sincerely yours,
Ronbothunter
All Rights Reserved
Copyright Ronbothunter— All Rights Reserved, Without Prejudice UCC 1-308 & 1-103.6. I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I did not enter knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally. I do not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement.
Comment by ronbothunter — July 30, 2008 @ 2:56 pm
@tuffyt
I agree he wasn’t very forthcoming about the dollar amount he spent and I agree that it’s wrong to “pay for salvation”. From what I can gather, though, I don’t think Jim sees it as religious doctrine as much as workable self-help courses. Since he isn’t an OT, he hasn’t really gotten to the levels where more of the dogmatic themes of Scientology come to light. In essence, what I think is happening, in Jim’s case, is that he’s found the original, pre-religion version of Scientology to be workable which is understandable since that’s what jump started the religion in the first place.
@34mezzo
Ahh, but L Ron built in a safeguard for that. He said very negative things about people who’d want Scientology tech for free. Plus, they’ll cite cost of operations and possibly draw a comparison to life saving medications that don’t come sans price tag. All in all, for me, it’s not about the tech or how much it costs people to learn it (it’s your prerogative if you want to pay $100,000 for a self help course, no skin off my nose). To me, it’s about the abusive nature of the Church.
Comment by Anon, Anon, My Boyfriend's Back! — July 30, 2008 @ 3:53 pm
@Ronbot Spammer
To save a RONBOT BRAIN you must reprogram it with NEW BRAINWASHING
I fixed it for you. I think this is what you meant to say.
Now,
Go. Uh. Way.
Love,
AAMBB
Comment by Anon, Anon, My Boyfriend's Back! — July 30, 2008 @ 3:56 pm
ronbothunter:
If you like to pontificate so much, get your own website. This one is ours.
tl;dr
Seriously.
Sincerely,
k
Comment by k — July 30, 2008 @ 4:28 pm
How dare they claim one can be both a Christian and a Scientologist. Need we forget that Hubbard claimed there was NO Christ?
Comment by iloveGod — July 30, 2008 @ 4:51 pm
“Anyway, Everyman is then shown to have been crucified so don’t think that it’s an accident that this crucifixion, they found out that this applied. Somebody somewhere on this planet, back about 600 BC, found some pieces of R6, and I don’t know how they found it, either by watching madmen or something, but since that time they have used it and it became what is known as Christianity. The man on the Cross. THERE WAS NO CHRIST. But the man on the cross is shown as Everyman. So of course each person seeing a crucified man, has an immediate feeling of sympathy for this man. Therefore you get many PCs who says they are Christ. Now, there’s two reasons for that, one is the Roman Empire was prone to crucify people, so a person can have been crucified, but in R6 he is shown as crucified.”
From “Assists” lecture. 3 October 1968. #10 in the confidential Class VIII series of lectures:
Comment by Marcab Soldier — July 30, 2008 @ 7:47 pm
Thanks Marcab Soldier.
What is at issue isn’t whether or not they believe in Christ. Many people don’t. The issue I have a problem with is the way they misrepresent who they are by saying you can be both, when clearly, you can not!
Comment by iloveGod — July 30, 2008 @ 11:44 pm
I love the spin they always try to put on this excerpt.
“Uhm, what Hubbard meant by ‘THERE WAS NO CHRIST’ is that the person being audited wasn’t Christ because many people were crucified in those times.”
I think the big key to a big problem is understanding what Hubbard wrote. And, not in the sense that Terryeo always yammers on about. He (Hubbard) was a hack. You’d almost have to be insane to follow and understand what he says and writes. It’s no wonder that they have to spend so much time trying to “understand” what Hubbard meant.
Comment by Anon, Anon, My Boyfriend's Back! — July 31, 2008 @ 10:02 am
AAMBB,
Tried to post this on the thread with Jim Warren, but it still applies here.
The reason that you find difficulty in following and understanding what Hubbard says and writes is due to his use of Milton Erickson’s confusion technique of brainwashing. You can read more here: (http://) http://www.lermanet.com/exit/confusion-technique.htm
Also wanted to throw out there that i have “black leather monster” by the plasmatics on vinyl!
-reason
Comment by Reason — July 31, 2008 @ 10:59 am
wendy o williams committed suicide, sad.
Comment by tuffyt — July 31, 2008 @ 11:44 am
@Reason
Yeah, I’ve read that about the confusion technique and figured it was either that or all the rum…or the pinks and greys…or the Vistaril. My guess? Probably all of the above.
Comment by Anon, Anon, My Boyfriend's Back! — August 1, 2008 @ 12:45 am
If you listen closely, you can almost hear Tom singing:
“He’s my little Deuce Coupe, You don’t know what I’ve got …”
Comment by Jack — August 1, 2008 @ 10:40 am
Perfect work!
cialis , viagra , xanax , viagra , xanax ,
Comment by John937 — June 27, 2009 @ 10:40 am