Brooke Hogan’s Bikini Bod Helps Distract Us From “Special” Friend
Sometimes it’s difficult NOT to feel sorry for Brooke Hogan, daughter of fake-wrestling legend Hulk Hogan and creepy-cougar mom Linda Hogan. Not only did Brooke get the raw end of the stick genetics wise, but she’s constantly forced to defend every single member of her immediately family a little too often.
Brooke gets a bad rap in the tabloids for being a hulking she-male (pun intended), but given what she has to work with, she does the best she can. Girlfriend’s like 10-feet tall and built like an Amazon, but she also, for being a giant, has a nice figure. It’s like a normal well-built woman’s figure, just on a much larger scale. So, you’d think, knowing she has this disadvantage, she’d be careful not to date a guy smaller than she is. Well, in this case, he’s not only smaller, but I think he’s special, if you know what I mean.
Brooke’s new man goes by the name Stack$. No, you read that right. Our buddy Stack$ looks like some kind of confused wangster, but with a lame ghetto name. And predictably, he’s some kind of rapper, so there you go. But something about this dude is off. He reminds me of those sad cases of fetal alcohol syndrome babies, but all grown up. I can’t put my finger on it, but I am guessing Stack$ wore a helmet in school and rode the short bus. This makes me sad 
But not as sad as watching Brooke practically pick him just to kiss him. It’s like when my kid plays with her Barbie dolls, but instead of having Barbie kiss a Ken doll, she’s using a little troll doll, minus the hair. Which to be honest, Stack$ could really use. Stack$’ naked head is straight out of my nightmares.
That’s it, all I got. Oh, and the above pics (courtesy of Dlisted) were taken on the set of Brooke’s new music video. Yes, apparently she just keeps trying. *sigh*
Pink Stripe WordPress Theme Designed by Joni Mueller &
Honestly, she’s good looking.
That boyfriend of hers, however, looks sleazy and stupid. And only an idiot would call himself Stack$. Only a complete idiot.
Comment by Stimp — April 21, 2009 @ 9:43 pm
Definitely a butterface.
Comment by J.R. LeMar — April 21, 2009 @ 10:07 pm
so does bashing on scientology lend your site credibility for when you decide to use fetal alcohol syndrome or mental retardation as a way to insult someone? seriously, get over it. there has to be some cognitive dissonance going on between running a site that vacillates between pandering to /b/ and 3rd rate celebrity gossip
Comment by whatever — April 21, 2009 @ 11:43 pm
Valid point “whatever”, but writing Scientology stories are like crafting a composition of music. It requires detail, precision and insight. Writing inane and mean comments about celebs, even ones deserving it, is pointless and stupid.
This post sucked.
I’m sorry.
Comment by D — April 21, 2009 @ 11:54 pm
Huh?!? What was that about? Frankly, I’ve seen far-worse celebrity insults on this site before, and have called the writers on it. But it’s hard to imagine why this one in particular would upset someone so much. It was rather mild, overall.
Heck, the dude *does* look kinda “slow” in that first pic. And she’s got her father’s face.
Comment by J.R. LeMar — April 22, 2009 @ 12:01 am
[...] Source: D [...]
Pingback by Celebrity Blog | Babelogs | Celebrity Gossip » Blog Archive » Brooke Hogan’s Bikini Bod Helps Distract Us From “Special” Friend — April 22, 2009 @ 3:05 am
I know Stacks and he is a real classy sweet gentleman, brooke is very lucky to have a great guy like him.
Comment by Sandy — April 22, 2009 @ 5:55 am
I doubt anyone who goes by the name Stack$ is classy, but hey, whatever you say. I should not however have implied anything untoward to those with disabilities, that’s what I was apologizing for, not so much the celeb insults.
I went for the obvious joke and it pretty much failed. Hey, you can’t win them all. And JRL, we don’t typically insult celebs just for the fun of it, but I appreciate that you and I saw the same thing in these two
Comment by Dawn — April 22, 2009 @ 8:22 am
As someone who has a family member who is mentally and physically disabled I found your post in poor taste. It is possible to be funny without being mean.
You are a mother. Think how you would feel if one of your children had to ride the “short bus” or “wear a helmet”. Think how you would feel if you had to read something like this.
Comment by maskay — April 22, 2009 @ 8:35 am
Yeah, I kind of pointed that out and apologized. Probably time to move on.
Comment by D — April 22, 2009 @ 8:47 am
Thing is, your apology came off as a secondary thought afeter your defense of writing about Scientology. I had to go back and find it, the first time I read it I wasn’t sure what you were apologizing for, writing about Scientology, or the comments in your post?
However, when you tell someone its time to move on, it kinda takes away from your sincerity. JMO, sometimes its hard to get things across when its written and not spoken.
Comment by maskay — April 22, 2009 @ 10:22 am
I was apologizing for a lame post which might offend some. It was an after-thought and upon reconsideration, I realized it wasn’t a good post. But, the moving on was towards me, as in, I need to move on now.
It was sincere, or I wouldn’t have said it.
Comment by D — April 22, 2009 @ 11:34 am
In Dawn’s defense, not that she needs it, she was making more of a comparison. I don’t see it as her making fun of people with disabilities. Seems as if she was just making an observation.
Comment by D-Bomb — April 22, 2009 @ 10:36 pm
whatever – scientology is a cult and deserves bashing
you’re just pissed that she didn’t feed you some valid scientology bashing so you could take up for the cult and get their stat’s up, am I right?
Comment by tiger — April 23, 2009 @ 10:34 am
well it seems my last comment didn’t even make it through. nice.
but tiger, i can assure you (after having nearly been sued by the co$) that getting my non existent “stats” up is the least of my concerns. like a lot of this site’s viewers, I got here through chanology.
Comment by whatever — April 23, 2009 @ 9:13 pm