<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia Tells Scientology To GTFO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glosslip.com/2009/06/03/wikipedia-tells-scientology-to-gtfo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glosslip.com/2009/06/03/wikipedia-tells-scientology-to-gtfo/</link>
	<description>Celebrity gossip from our lips to yours</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:43:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seumas</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2009/06/03/wikipedia-tells-scientology-to-gtfo/comment-page-1/#comment-90065</link>
		<dc:creator>Seumas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 16:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/?p=11009#comment-90065</guid>
		<description>A few answers:

The government doesn&#039;t do anything about spyentology because the government loves it&#039;s money, if you think the fed aren&#039;t just as corrupt and evil as the psychopaths in spyentolgy, you&#039;re dreaming or on a heavy dose of a very powerful hallucinagen.

wikiped(o)ia is not, was not, and will not be a neutral &quot;encyclopedic&quot; place, and I encourage everyone that reads this to go elsewhere for information, do &quot;original research&quot; and form your own conclusions instead of expecting a fascist cabal of elitists to tell you anything. They are most certainly not neutral, and tend to have a group-think sort of hive going, I won&#039;t waste you folk&#039;s time by elaborating on that. (as for Elsewhere, I reccomend Wisegeek.com, howtodothings.com, yes this is legit... instructables.com is another good one.) 

Note: when wiki(d) says &quot;original research&quot; what they mean is information that isn&#039;t sponsored in some way or another; much like mainstream science and it&#039;s &quot;peer reviewed&quot; journals...like socialism, it&#039;s a nice concept but doesn&#039;t work in the real world.

As for where else to get encyclopedic information, try the britanica, you can get ebooks of it all over the place, torrents, etc. or goto a used books store / library, that&#039;s what they&#039;re there for. As for conducting your own research, aside from those places, refdesk.com is a good place for all manner of things (it&#039;s a reference desk afterall).
No I&#039;m not trying to advertise, I&#039;m just sharing some of the things I&#039;ve found useful.

Here&#039;s to you Anonymous, long may you be a great thorn in the backside of the most vile cult, and to you Queen, for having a most decent website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few answers:</p>
<p>The government doesn&#8217;t do anything about spyentology because the government loves it&#8217;s money, if you think the fed aren&#8217;t just as corrupt and evil as the psychopaths in spyentolgy, you&#8217;re dreaming or on a heavy dose of a very powerful hallucinagen.</p>
<p>wikiped(o)ia is not, was not, and will not be a neutral &#8220;encyclopedic&#8221; place, and I encourage everyone that reads this to go elsewhere for information, do &#8220;original research&#8221; and form your own conclusions instead of expecting a fascist cabal of elitists to tell you anything. They are most certainly not neutral, and tend to have a group-think sort of hive going, I won&#8217;t waste you folk&#8217;s time by elaborating on that. (as for Elsewhere, I reccomend Wisegeek.com, howtodothings.com, yes this is legit&#8230; instructables.com is another good one.) </p>
<p>Note: when wiki(d) says &#8220;original research&#8221; what they mean is information that isn&#8217;t sponsored in some way or another; much like mainstream science and it&#8217;s &#8220;peer reviewed&#8221; journals&#8230;like socialism, it&#8217;s a nice concept but doesn&#8217;t work in the real world.</p>
<p>As for where else to get encyclopedic information, try the britanica, you can get ebooks of it all over the place, torrents, etc. or goto a used books store / library, that&#8217;s what they&#8217;re there for. As for conducting your own research, aside from those places, refdesk.com is a good place for all manner of things (it&#8217;s a reference desk afterall).<br />
No I&#8217;m not trying to advertise, I&#8217;m just sharing some of the things I&#8217;ve found useful.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s to you Anonymous, long may you be a great thorn in the backside of the most vile cult, and to you Queen, for having a most decent website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moneen</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2009/06/03/wikipedia-tells-scientology-to-gtfo/comment-page-1/#comment-90060</link>
		<dc:creator>Moneen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 16:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/?p=11009#comment-90060</guid>
		<description>Scientology itself censors what Scientologists may or may not be involved with.
A Scientologist may only agree with Scientology according to the lines of the scripts of Hubbard.
They may not agree with Scientology or defend it by how they think or in their own words.
Scientology states that it is a non denominational religion but the mote into it a person becomes they are then told they are not allowed to mix practices meaning that only Scientology may be used.
Much later into Scientology Christianity &amp; other religions are critically judged by Hubbard.
The demand of Scientology is that only Scientology must occupy the minds of converts &amp; that only Scientology must be prescribed always at a cost that becomes the on going subscription to the demands of Scientology by converts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientology itself censors what Scientologists may or may not be involved with.<br />
A Scientologist may only agree with Scientology according to the lines of the scripts of Hubbard.<br />
They may not agree with Scientology or defend it by how they think or in their own words.<br />
Scientology states that it is a non denominational religion but the mote into it a person becomes they are then told they are not allowed to mix practices meaning that only Scientology may be used.<br />
Much later into Scientology Christianity &amp; other religions are critically judged by Hubbard.<br />
The demand of Scientology is that only Scientology must occupy the minds of converts &amp; that only Scientology must be prescribed always at a cost that becomes the on going subscription to the demands of Scientology by converts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celebrity Blog &#124; Babelogs &#124; Celebrity Gossip &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wikipedia Tells Scientology To GTFO</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2009/06/03/wikipedia-tells-scientology-to-gtfo/comment-page-1/#comment-89951</link>
		<dc:creator>Celebrity Blog &#124; Babelogs &#124; Celebrity Gossip &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wikipedia Tells Scientology To GTFO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 05:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/?p=11009#comment-89951</guid>
		<description>[...]  Queen Related Posts:Clearwater Scientologist Assaults Member Of AnonymousOperation Reconnect: April 12, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Queen Related Posts:Clearwater Scientologist Assaults Member Of AnonymousOperation Reconnect: April 12, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cee</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2009/06/03/wikipedia-tells-scientology-to-gtfo/comment-page-1/#comment-89931</link>
		<dc:creator>Cee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/?p=11009#comment-89931</guid>
		<description>Wikipedia would have to be the world&#039;s first reactive encyclopedia.  I think if the could, they would burn Scientology books as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia would have to be the world&#8217;s first reactive encyclopedia.  I think if the could, they would burn Scientology books as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2009/06/03/wikipedia-tells-scientology-to-gtfo/comment-page-1/#comment-89860</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/?p=11009#comment-89860</guid>
		<description>Queen, this is good news.  I got so much conflicting info from Wikipedia (Its banned in Greece/it isn&#039;t; Jada Pinkett is a Scilon; she isn&#039;t; etc.) because of the persistent re-edits by Scilons.

As to why the US govt. won&#039;t do anything, good question.  Cults are routinely prosecuted for child abuse, tax evasion, etc. (like the fundamentalist mormons) but not Co$.  These other sects need to start complaining about selective prosecution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Queen, this is good news.  I got so much conflicting info from Wikipedia (Its banned in Greece/it isn&#8217;t; Jada Pinkett is a Scilon; she isn&#8217;t; etc.) because of the persistent re-edits by Scilons.</p>
<p>As to why the US govt. won&#8217;t do anything, good question.  Cults are routinely prosecuted for child abuse, tax evasion, etc. (like the fundamentalist mormons) but not Co$.  These other sects need to start complaining about selective prosecution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tilman</title>
		<link>http://glosslip.com/2009/06/03/wikipedia-tells-scientology-to-gtfo/comment-page-1/#comment-89859</link>
		<dc:creator>Tilman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glosslip.com/?p=11009#comment-89859</guid>
		<description>Sadly, several scientology critics - including me - have been blocked as well. My &quot;crime&quot; was to have edited on &lt;a href=&quot;http://home.snafu.de/tilman/Barbara_Schwarz_8.8.2006.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Barbara Schwarz&lt;/a&gt; several years ago. I predict that the scientology article will now be gutted by stealth scientologists, other cultists (e.g. Jayen and Jossi), and cult lobbyists (e.g. Fossa). This is what has already been acomplished in the german wikipedia, where the scientology article reads almost like a commercial for that persecuted cult of greed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, several scientology critics &#8211; including me &#8211; have been blocked as well. My &#8220;crime&#8221; was to have edited on <a href="http://home.snafu.de/tilman/Barbara_Schwarz_8.8.2006.html" rel="nofollow">Barbara Schwarz</a> several years ago. I predict that the scientology article will now be gutted by stealth scientologists, other cultists (e.g. Jayen and Jossi), and cult lobbyists (e.g. Fossa). This is what has already been acomplished in the german wikipedia, where the scientology article reads almost like a commercial for that persecuted cult of greed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
