Will Disclosure In Court Be Scientology’s Undoing In UK Teen’s “Cult” Case?
Since when did it become a crime to call a cult a cult? Apparently about two weeks ago.
On May 10th, at the 4th global protest staged by the internet activist group Anonymous, a London Teenager, who goes by the moniker “ENG” or Epic Nose Guy, was arrested for leaving a sign up that called the Church of Scientology a “CULT.” Here’s a breakdown of events from the Guardian UK:
A teenager is facing prosecution for using the word “cult” to describe the Church of Scientology.
The unnamed 15-year-old was served the summons by City of London police when he took part in a peaceful demonstration opposite the London headquarters of the controversial religion.
Officers confiscated a placard with the word “cult” on it from the youth, who is under 18, and a case file has been sent to the Crown Prosecution Service.
A date has not yet been set for him to appear in court.
The decision to issue the summons has angered human rights activists and support groups for the victims of cults.
The incident happened during a protest against the Church of Scientology on May 10. Demonstrators from the anti-Scientology group, Anonymous, who were outside the church’s £23m headquarters near St Paul’s cathedral, were banned by police from describing Scientology as a cult by police because it was “abusive and insulting”.
Writing on an anti-Scientology website, the teenager facing court said: “I brought a sign to the May 10th protest that said: ‘Scientology is not a religion, it is a dangerous cult.’
“‘Within five minutes of arriving I was told by a member of the police that I was not allowed to use that word, and that the final decision would be made by the inspector.”
A policewoman later read him section five of the Public Order Act and “strongly advised” him to remove the sign. The section prohibits signs which have representations or words which are threatening, abusive or insulting.
The teenager refused to back down, quoting a 1984 high court ruling from Mr Justice Latey, in which he described the Church of Scientology as a “cult” which was “corrupt, sinister and dangerous”.
This young man showed huge brass ones by his decision to not take down the sign when ordered by police. While some may cringe at the comparison, I liken this to those who refused to sit at the back of the bus. Peaceful protests are the earmark of democracy, how else can “the people” raise awareness about authoritative groups trying to control the masses through deception and intimidation? What is left for us as a society to protect our freedoms, if you can’t meet with like-minded individuals to express your outrage against well documented abuses and criminal collusion? More importantly, how can you prosecute one individual for using a “word” which most accurately describes that which you are protesting? Also significant, is the precedent set over the last twenty years of many, many publications using this term to describe the Church of Scientology.















