See, racism comes in all shapes and sizes, and most certainly in all forms of bitchiness!

Last week we reported supermodel and serial psycho Naomi Campbell was arrested for attacking airport officers when she attacked them, spit at them and generally throw a fit about her luggage being lost at Heathrow Airport in London.

British Airways has banned her for life!!! YAY BA. Does that stand for Bitch Airways, better trademark that stat.

As if all of that wasn’t bad enough, we now have a report out of The Sun stating Naomi also hurled racial epithets at the arresting officers:

Now cops claim she called a WPC a “white ****” and a “white s**g” as she was dragged off the LA-bound jet in handcuffs.

The police source said Naomi continued, screaming: “f***ing white honkeys” at the officer and her colleagues.

Campbell is also alleged to have accused the officers of arresting her simply for being black. Funny how that works you know? You walk around and flaunt your wealth, fame and power and expect to considered racially transparent as far as people’s perception of you, but then as soon as you misbehave and act in a violent manner, then it’s ok to bust out the race card. Not buying it this time biznatch!

I wish I knew what that four letter word was they bleeped out up there. You can always tell the class of a person by how willing they are to drop certain words. If it started with C ended in T and rhymed with punt, then Naomi isn’t just an angry racist, she’s also a vile skank. No decent woman would call another woman something like that in public (private is a different matter).

Of all the famous people who find themselves in trouble, I hate to admit it, but I take great pleasure in imagining Naomi getting the book thrown at her — and a blackberry, and a cellphone, perhaps an anvil as well.

Theories are floating that Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard was murdered as part of a hostile takeover of the Church of Scientology by current leader David Miscavige perhaps with the help of a high-level Scientologist named Norman Starkey. As is told by the author of one version of this theory, Starkey took over as executor of LRH’s estate in a vicious struggle for control of the wealthy, but failing Church.

This was 1986, the Church was spending millions of dollars battling the IRS, they had yet to claw their way out of the abyss of public ill-will created by Operation Snow White, when several members of the Church, including L. Ron Hubbard’s own wife, Sue, were indicted in 1979 and sent to prison for breaking into federal government offices and attempting to pervert and extort officials within the IRS and FBI.

Operation Snow White was the Church of Scientology’s name for a project during the 1970s to purge unfavorable records about Scientology and its founder L. Ron Hubbard. This project included a series of infiltrations and thefts from 136 government agencies, foreign embassies and consulates, as well as private organizations critical of Scientology, carried out by Church members; the single largest infiltration of the United States government in history[1] with up to 5,000 covert agents.[2] This was also the operation that exposed ‘Operation Freakout’, due to the fact that this was the case that brought the government into investigation on the Church.[2]

Under this program, Scientology operatives committed infiltration, wiretapping, and theft of documents in government offices, most notably those of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. Eleven highly-placed Church executives, including Mary Sue Hubbard (wife of founder L. Ron Hubbard and second-in-command of the organization), pleaded guilty or were convicted in federal court of obstructing justice, burglary of government offices, and theft of documents and government property. The case was United States vs. Mary Sue Hubbard et al., 493 F. Supp. 209.

To put it bluntly, the Church was in crisis, and L. Ron Hubbard was old and in the way, no longer the revered and exalted spiritual leader he is often portrayed by the Church of Scientology propoganda machine. Think Chairman Mao, a mythic revolutionary figure who had long outlasted his usefulness.

The backdrop to Hubbard’s final days living in the dusty town of Creston, California under an assumed identity:

Pat and Annie Broeker, loyal friends of LRH, had essentially assigned themselves the task of looking after an ailing and increasingly senile Hubbard in his day-to-day functions. At the time, most considered the Broekers the heir apparent to take control of the Church of Scientology upon Hubbard’s death.

In his final days, Hubbard was on the run with the IRS looking for him, and in many cases, he and the Church were run out of several countries having worn out their welcome, which may explain Hubbard’s mythic wanderlust. Rather than being some sort of sea-faring Captain sailing the trade-winds and charting his course, Hubbard was a man on the run, who managed to keep one step ahead of the authorities with the help of funds extracted by the unwitting members who gladly continued to donate in hopes of crossing the bridge to total freedom.

In many ways, Hubbard was just smart enough to get himself into real trouble, but not in possession of enough mental faculties to do anything but run when confronted. An eccentric scholar of science fiction and pseudo-psychology, Hubbard, unlike his successor, David Miscavige, was not capable of navigating his own empire with the kind of ruthless, and unyielding leadership a secret and sinister business/religion seemed to require.

To be continued…

Miscavige’s role in Hubbard’s suspicious death.

Rob Lowe posted an impassioned article on Huffington’s Post recently about a very difficult situation in his personal life. According to his portrayal, his family is under attack by a former employee, Laura Boyce, who after many years of working closely with the family, suddenly disappeared last November without a clue as to where she went or why. The Lowe’s for their part became concerned enough for this woman’s whereabouts they filed a missing person’s report, only then did she come forward, and the nature of her disappearance revealed: she wanted money or she was telling on them.

Sounds mysterious and salacious, huh? No doubt Lowe’s own sordid past from his youth may be coming back to haunt him, or in this case, used against him. Before we even get into the specifics, I will give you my take initially.

Anyone in the public eye who is forthcoming with these kinds of issues strikes me as someone who has the facts on their side, I doubt Lowe, who has weathered his own personal storms, would be so bold as to make proclamations about his families innocence against claims of abuse, if he weren’t sure they could stand up under scrutiny. I could be wrong, but human nature is some instances, is VERY predictable.

But wait, there’s more…

We could have seen this one coming ten miles away. The RTC, or Religious Technology Center as it also known (David Miscavige is President) has issued a cease and desist letter to Wikileaks.org for posting several high level and “copyrighted”
documents on its site. From the WikiNews article:

On March 9, 2008, Wikileaks published several documents relating to the Church’s Office of Special Affairs and personal notes gathered by Frank Oliver, a former Scientologist and former member of the Church’s Special Affairs office. On March 26, 2008, Wikileaks published the entire set of the Churches ‘Operating Thetan Level’ documents which included handwritten notes by Scientology’s founder L. Ron Hubbard.

Although the letter does not mention specific legal threats against Wikileaks, the letter asks that they “preserve any and all documents pertaining to this matter and this customer, including, but not limited to, logs, data entry sheets, applications — electronic or otherwise, registrations forms, billings statements or invoices, computer print-outs, disks, hard drives, etc.”

Despite the letter, Wikileaks states they will not to comply with the “abusive request” by the Church.

“Wikileaks will not comply with legally abusive requests from Scientology any more than Wikileaks has complied with similar demands from Swiss banks, Russian off-shore stem cell centers, former African Kleptocrats, or the Pentagon. Wikileaks will remain a place where people of the world may safely expose injustice and corruption,” stated Wikileaks in a statement on their website.

The data posted is the Operating Thetan Levels 1 through 8 and these documents are considered secret and I’ve heard that when you pay your $300,000 plus “donations” to the Church, they send you in a sealed room, with the sealed documents (OT levels) and you must sign all sorts of legal documents declaring you will never tell another soul what you saw.

*rolls eyes*

Well, I guess so much for all the secrecy. Now, like any sacred scripture meant to enlighten and guide spiritually those who desire truth and wisdom, they need only venture over to WIKILEAKS.ORG for their fix of Hubbard goodness.

My advice to Wikileaks is DON’T PULL THOSE DOCS. Gawker doubled their traffic and made a assload of money for refusing to pull some goofy video of Tom Cruise spewing like a Scilon puppet, imagine the gold bouillon those OT Levels will bring you.

In the last few months I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about Scientology, why it’s popular among celebrities, why it’s so controversial, and how it has managed to exist and grow in spite of an outspoken and tenacious critical community pushing against it.

This process of analysis wouldn’t have existed without the emergence of a group of internet activists calling themselves Anonymous. I wish to take nothing away from the grizzled and wearied vets who’ve paved the way over the last two decades to expose the seedy, sinister and dangerous underbelly of the CoS heirarchy, but what these brave critics lacked were the numbers. Anonymous, by its very nature, represents numbers, bodies, a mass.

Present day Scientology CLAIMS it has changed and reformed itself from the scandal known as Operation Snow White, when in the early 80’s several members of the Church were arrested and convicted on charges stemming from their attempts to infiltrate, penetrate and corrupt out own federal government. I contend their claims are dubious, but I do so with the vast amount of resources, irrefutable data and unimpeachable sources from provided by the mass of Anonymous.

But wait, there’s more…

If I were Sir Paul, I’d make sure the family bunny rabbit stays securely locked up.

Heather Mills has brought her special brand of crazazy to town again…yes, and this time she is setting her sights on Sir Paul’s new woman:

Barmy Heather Mills has vowed revenge on Sir Paul McCartney - by wrecking his new romance.

Heather fears he may start a new family with Nancy Shevell,47, and snub daughter Bea, four.

The bitter ex-model, 40, even plans to phone her to warn her off-yet outrageously claims she will be doing it for Nancy’s good. A pal revealed: “Heather’s threatening to call and explain the dangers of dating a Beatle.

“She had hell with the public hating her and reckons Nancy could too. Heather genuinely thinks she’s doing Nancy a good turn.”

Bitter, party of one!

Heather is reportedly incensed because Sir Paul told her that he and Nancy were just friends, but they were spotted on a romantic getaway to Antigua swimming, boating, and rubbing sunscreen on each other:

Heather’s lawyer Gloria Allred has claimed she wishes her ex-husband “all the best in his new relationship”.

But her friend told how the pleasantries hid a seething fury - and Heather felt “deceived and betrayed” because Macca told her he and Nancy were just pals. The source added: “She went ballistic when she found out. She’s also terrified they’re planning a baby - even though Nancy’s not far off 50 - and thinks another child will detract from Beatrice.”

Um, no, Heather…I think you’ve already covered the “Marry And Be Impregnated By A Former Beatle So You Can Get Even More Money” angle.  Besides, the woman is almost fifty years old…yes, she could possibly get pregnant, but why would she want to?

With every move Heather makes, she comes across as more and more crazy.  There’s just no other way to put it.  Seriously…calling up your ex-husband’s girlfriend to “warn” her of the dangers of dating him?  Maybe if the ex-husband were Charles Manson, but Sir Paul McCartney?  I think the only real danger for Nancy is confusing some of his primo weed with the parsley.  I can see Sir Paul wanting Heather to know about his new woman for Beatrice’s sake (common with divorced parents), but other than that he has no obligation whatsoever to keep Heather updated on anything in his life.  That’s why they’re called EXES, Heather…you’re an EX-wife.

And what is this worrying that a new, hypothetical baby from a possibly menopausal woman would take attention away from Beatrice?  Does she forget that he has other children as well?  Have they taken away any attention from Beatrice?  Besides, there is no child yet, and the chances of their being one is probably slim to none…yet Heather has chosen to get all het up about a baby that hasn’t even been concieved nor is likely to!

I wonder how long it will take before Sir Paul decides to seek full custody of Bea?  (my answer…not soon enough)

Nancy, we’ve traced the call…it’s coming from…HEATHER!!!  <dramatic music>

 

Denise Richards refuses to talk about her weight in front of her girls for fear it will set a bad example for them:

“I’ll never talk about weight around them,” the actress tells Shape magazine in its May issue. “And they’ll never hear me say, ‘Mommy’s feeling fat today.’ That kind of attitude just makes young girls grow up to be dissatisfied with their bodies.”

Instead, Richards says she tries to set an active example for her girls, Sam, 4, and Lola, 2.

“Working out is part of my life, not just an I-have-to-get-ready-for-a-photo-shoot thing,” she tells the magazine. “I exercise almost every day. The girls usually play in the workout room with me, so they’re learning by example.”

However, she has no problems whatsoever warping their psyches by pimping them out on her new reality TV show, using them to get ratings (and ultimately money in her pocket).

While I agree that we should present healthy body images to our daughters, and not constantly talk about how dissatisfied we are with this or that about ourselves, whoring out toddlers for the sole purpose of putting money in your own pocket probably isn’t the best thing for them either.  After all, these little girls are not of an age where they can consent to ruin their lives on their own.  Guess that’s where momma has to step in.

Remember…contact E!, tell them how disappointed you are that they are choosing to air this show, and boycott!

 

Oh, the hits just keep coming from our favorite peg-legged British hoooooah.  (Anyone who saw her rant on British morning television will get that last one.)  Turns out that while she lambasted Sir Paul for not giving their daughter Beatrice enough money to fly “A” class (I assume that is first class), it is actually Heather who is relegating her to the back of the plane:

Mucca slammed ex Sir Paul McCartney on Monday for forcing the four-year-old to travel “B Class” after their bitter divorce — while he flew “A Class”.

She haughtily vowed to pay for Beatrice’s first-class travel herself.

But details obtained by The Sun show the one-legged gold-digger has ALREADY failed to live up to her pledge.

Heather, dubbed Pornocchio after her divorce judge branded her a scheming liar, jets to New York this weekend to rest after her court war with ex-Beatle Paul, 65.

But she is sending Bea home early with a minder and nanny in the £409 seats [about $820 USD] at the back of a Virgin jet.

Mucca, 40, will fly to LA the same day for a further three weeks before jetting home alone — in a £3,348 [$6,700 USD] Virgin Upper Class berth. [...]

Both are booked in swish Upper Class on an outbound flight from Heathrow as their minder goes economy.

They will be joined days later by a nanny who is booked to jet home with Bea and the minder on another Virgin flight.

Bea’s seat is reserved in the economy section with her companions.

Upper Class and the flight’s Premium Economy cabin showed “wide open” availability yesterday.

Mucca is booked in business class on her Continental Airlines flight from New York to LA.

She is then scheduled to return home on Virgin, again flying Upper Class.

Six. Thousand. Dollars.  For a first class seat for Mucca and her peg leg (no, I’m not picking on the physically handicapped, just Heather), while her daughter, whom she professes to do everything for, flies coach.  According to the divorce papers, Beatrice gets £35,000 [over $70,000 USD] every year to travel and be with her father.  In this case, little Bea and her minder will be flying from New York back to merry olde England while her mother stays here in the States, presumably doing business with her lawyer/bulldog Gloria Allred.  What, poor Heather can’t rest in one of her homes?

So let’s do the math.  At $6000 a seat for first class, and two tickets (one for Bea, one for the nanny), that’s about six trips across the pond per year.  But Bea won’t usually be making transatlantic flights…she’ll be going from one end of the UK to another.  The fee for jetting around the UK is probably at least half that.  And little Bea probably won’t be flying all the time…I’ll bet there will be times when daddy will be near enough that he will send a car for her.  Basically, Bea can fly first class…as long as she’s going with her mother, to where her mother wants to go.  However, when it comes time to go see dad, it’s coach.

Have you ever heard of Munchhausen’s Syndrome By Proxy?  Basically (and this is a quick synopsis, not a detailed definition) it’s when parents make up an illness or injury to their child to get attention for themselves, so people will then look at the parent and feel sorry for them and be in awe at how well the parent handles everything under such pressure.  Parents will go so far as to poison or injure their own children in order to keep up the charade so as to get attention for themselves.

I think this is similar to what is going on with Bea (and to so many children of divorced parents), although not with illness or injury but with lifestyle and money.  Heather can now step back and say, “Look at poor little Bea, she has to travel B class to go see her father, the miserable miser,” when the reality is that there is more than enough money there for Bea and her nanny to travel any way they like.  Even if Heather eventually has to make up a little out of her own pocket, she received millions of pounds in the settlement, more than enough to do so…the woman is not headed to the workhouse any time soon, no matter her protestations to the contrary.  And I’ll bet Sir Paul (as many divorced fathers are wont to do) will kick in a little more under the table for his daughter to fly or travel to see him.

But in Heather’s mind, she’s coming out looking like the poor, put-upon, long-suffering ex-wife who must put up with such things in order to let her daughter see her father.  And I’ll bet my cup of hot tea she’s telling her daughter that it’s daddy’s fault that she’s flying in the back of the plane.

Fantasist, indeed.

There’s something unholy about a Paris Hilton caressing South African orphans.

Not only because she is a diseased attention-whore, but also because she has a history of being a bigoted racist who has been video-taped screwing people on films and wharfing lines of coke the size of a center-divider on the freeway.

IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com - Paris Hilton’s Racist New Years Part 2

Clearly a sense of shame is not something Paris possesses, because she used a visit to South Africa to pimp herself out as some kind of good samaritan. I suppose it’s possible the administrators of the South African orphanage where Paris visited where unaware of her legendary whorishness, but we here in the States, where stories of Paris are usually accompanied with mugshots, bare vaginas and penises, are not buying it.

At least Glosslip’s not buying it. Do not be fooled by the beautiful faces of these children, Paris is still all about Paris.

Paris was in South Africa with her boyfriend of the moment, Good Charlotte’s Bengi Madden (brother of Nicole Ritchie’s baby-daddy Joel Madden) where they will be performing in Johannesburg, at the aptly titled My Coke Fest. Seriously, who came up with that title? Some marketing reject? Paris and My Coke Fest? Sounds like any weekend at casa de Hilton. Sometimes the jokes write themselves.

story via dlisted.com

 

Give that man an award for Most Obvious Statement This Decade.

Peepaw Martin Sheen is none too happy that his granddaughters are being pimped out by former daughter-in-law Denise “Someone’s tampered wit da bawwwwmb” Richards for her new reality series:

The veteran actor has hit out at the actress’s decision to include his granddaughters in her new reality TV show, branding the move “a mistake”.

Denise, 37, who has been locked in a bitter feud with Charlie since their marriage crumbled in 2006, is opening up her home to film the series for America’s E! network. [...]

According to the New York Post’s gossip column Page Six, The West Wing’s Sheen said: “We were hoping they wouldn’t be exposed to that. It’s unfortunate. But she’s of a mind where it’s important to her.

“Maybe she has to get involved with something to realise how big a mistake it is.”

He’s a bit crazazy himself, but he does have a point.  Daddy Charlie Sheen took Denise (voted the Worst Bond Girl) to court last year attempting to stop his daughters’ involvement, but incredibly the judge agreed with Denise and allowed filming to continue.

Charlie has a good idea:

The Two And A Half Men star Charlie, who is now engaged to Brooke Mueller, said last month: “I think we should all just boycott the damn thing.”

I’m no big fan of the man-slut, but he has a point.  If nobody watches, then there is no reason for a show.

Therefore, I propose this:  Don’t just boycott the show, boycott the whole network.  E! has a large network of shows watched by a large number of people.  If people stop watching, maybe it will send a message that we, as a viewing public, do not appreciate having innocent young children (who have no say in the matter) pimped out for public consumption.  Denise is doing this for one reason only…to pad her bank account.

Write, email, call E! and tell them that this will not stand.  These little girls didn’t sign a contract and they didn’t agree to any of this.  They are little children who do not understand the scope of what is actually going on here.  They are two and three years old…how can they make an informed decision?  The only things they should be making a decision about concerning television are whether to watch Sesame Street or Disney Princesses.

Yes, I know that there are many stupid reality shows on E!, but they mostly feature adults who are old enough to consent to what they are doing (well, Keeping Up With The Kardashians has a 9 and 11-year-old, and I don’t agree with that, but there is a big difference between a toddler and a tweenager, and this particular post is about toddlers…I’ll get to the Kardashians another time).  These two little girls have no say.

So far, this link is all I can find for online contact (the “Contact Us” link just takes you to a null page, and the other “Contact Us” link I found opens a page but nothing is on it).  I did find these addresses and phone numbers:

E! Entertainment Television
5750 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90036

Phone:  323-954-2400
Fax:  323-954-2661

Be respectful, be decent, be literate and intelligent, do NOT be stupid or threatening, but be firm in stating that as long as there is a show featuring toddlers who do not have a say in the matter, you will not be tuning in to E!.  Join me!