GlossLip, Celebrity Gossip From Our Lips To Yours

05/01/2008 (10:46 am)

“Struck” The Film, Celeb Scientologists Team Up For Romantic Comedy

This movie may or may not be good, I won’t make a judgment call on that as I haven’t seen it. The cast reads like a who’s who in Scientology, Jenna and Bodhi Elfman, Helena Christensen, Kelly Preston, Nancy Cartright (huh, WTF?), Marisol Nichols (married to producer Taron Lexton) — all Scientologists, the writers, Milena Ferreira, her husband Nathan Lorch, Scientologists, and it’s being financed and produced by, you guessed it, a Scientologist, Taron Lexton.

The romantic comedy starring Bodhi Elfman, is about a man who is struck by an arrow which doesn’t harm him, but he can’t remove it either. Interesting….

I guess that’s ok, the Church has been colluding with industry insiders for years to take over Hollywood, why not just come out and be obvious about it. I wonder though, did they cast only Scientologists because it’s so good they didn’t want to share, or because these people can’t get work elsewhere because Hollywood, mainstream America and the world at large are sick of Scientology and their star roster forcing their faith down our throats via Tom Cruise, John Travolta and Kirstie Alley.

The films been premiering at film festivals, including one in Newport Beach, CA. yesterday. If anyone’s seen this, please feel free to give us your review. I can’t impugn the work of the actors, they’re all good in their own right. I can however impugn their judgment in not looking more closely at their chosen faith and asking some tough question.

Good luck with the new film CoS shills, I hope it doesn’t SUCK.

Posted by D
Filed under: Anonymous, Conspiracy Theories, Hollyweird, Scientology

04/28/2008 (4:34 pm)

Creepy Kansas Song Is Creepy

Ok, “Dust In The Wind” it isn’t, but it sure makes me wonder if some members of the rock group Kansas weren’t also members of a well-known “religion” we like to refer to as a cult.

Anonymous Greatest Raid Hits
Kansas - Fair Exchange

Your credit is good if you’re a member
Just a token to help the people remember
All we’ve done for you
Nobody buys and nobody sells
And nobody speaks ’til the chairman tells you
We’re gonna be your religion, throw those others away

(Chorus)
Fair exchange for your freedom
Fair exchange for your life
Hail the new perfect order
Ending trouble and strife
No one can refuse our offer, it’s a fair exchange

You’re on file, our computer
Knows what’s best for you
We will provide the solution, for the rest of you
Safety and peace, the terror will cease
Forget everything the fanatics tell you
Now you can worship the leader
All he wants is your soul

Fair exchange for your freedom
Fair exchange for your life
Hail the new perfect order
Ending trouble and strife
No one can refuse our offer, it’s a fair exchange

We’re under control, never worry
Always watching you
Now you’re a part of the program
We’ll be using you
What do you want? We know what you need
Get out of line, we eliminate you
All for the good of the people
Better one man should die

Fair exchange for your freedom
Fair exchange for your life
Hail the new perfect order
Ending trouble and strife
No one can refuse our offer, it’s a fair exchange

Bad song is bad, but sucky cult sucks more.

[MitsuToo strikes again]

Posted by D
Filed under: Anonymous, Conspiracy Theories, Scientology, cults

03/03/2008 (11:05 am)

Actress Marion Cotillard Questions 9/11 Attacks

9112.jpg

According to some French actress who won an Oscar, the 9/11 attacks were just the United States wanting to destroy a couple of big buildings that were simply too expensive:9111.jpg

Referring to the two passenger jets being flown into the Twin Towers, [Marion] Cotillard said:

“We see other towers of the same kind being hit by planes. Are they burned? They [sic] was a tower, I believe it was in Spain, which burnt for 24 hours. It never collapsed. None of these towers collapsed. And there [in New York], in a few minutes, the whole thing collapsed.”

She added that the towers, planned in the early Sixties, were an outdated “money-sucker” that would have cost more to modernise than to rebuild altogether, which is why they were destroyed.

She said: “It was a money-sucker because they were finished, it seems to me, by 1973, and to re-cable all that, to bring up-to-date all the technology and everything, it was a lot more expensive, that work, than destroying them.”

She also doesn’t believe a man walked on the moon, although I include that more as a sad attempt at comic relief:

She said: “Did a man really walk on the Moon? I saw plenty of documentaries on it, and I really wondered. And in any case I don’t believe all they tell me, that’s for sure.”

Okay, Marion.  I get that we shouldn’t swallow every line of bull that comes down the pike and that you’re a quirky revolutionary thinker who thinks on a level above the rest of us peons (heretofore to be known as “Citizens Of The Real World”), so here’s a cookie.

marionoscar.jpg

I suppose the almost 3000 people killed that day were just “collateral damage”.  The attacks on the Pentagon and the downed plane in Pennsylvania, reportedly on its way to another attack site, were both red herrings designed to take the focus off the demolition of the Twin Towers.  The widespread panic, air pollution, injuries, and aftershocks in New York were just because the planes didn’t hit the buildings at the optimum angle for a clean implosion.  The firefighters and first responders who were injured and killed attempting to rescue those trapped in the buildings should have stayed out of a demo site.  All the people, including children, on the four airplanes involved were expendable and needed to be on the planes to give the impression that these were just routine flights.  I suppose one could say that the towers collapsed in “minutes”, because Tower 2 stood for 56 minutes before falling and Tower 1 stood for 102 minutes.  Nearby buildings that were damaged in the attacks, such as the other WTC buildings and St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church?  Well, maybe they needed to be torn down too, and it was just gravy that they happened to be damaged.

9113.jpg

I’m not gullible.  I know that there are many things about the attacks that horrible day which have yet to be explained, and there are many things we will never know.  I understand that we shouldn’t believe everything we hear, and not all is as it seems when it comes to politics and those involved in making it digestible.  Many, many mistakes were made both during and after the attacks, mistakes with long-term ramifications.  But for some actress to tell us that the planes full of innocent passengers flew into the towers because the buildings were outdated and needed to be torn down is at best stupid, and at worst…stupid.  She, of course, knows how the buildings properly should have burnt and fallen because she recieved her engineering degree at acting school…the same school that graduated Sean Penn with a degree in economics and Angelina Jolie with a diploma in world affairs.

911priest.jpg

Her insinuation that the towers were a “money-sucker” and it would be cheaper to fly planes into them in a form of demolition-via-aircraft are ironically laughable in the knowledge that the economy of Lower Manhattan was devastated after the planes flew into the buildings.  This doesn’t even include the effect the attacks had on the economy of New York as a whole, not to mention New Jersey and Washington.  She also hasn’t taken into account that the attacks and the ensuing aftermath have already cost New York almost $95 billion dollars, the Pentagon around $500 million dollars, and the incalculable cost it has taken on the lives and psyches both of those who lost loved ones and those who survived.

All that to tear down two buildings in a cost-effective manner.

The actress later insisted that it was all a misunderstanding, and that her remarks should in no way affect her acting career, in particular the new movie she’s making with Johnny Depp:marian2.jpg

Her Paris-based lawyer Vincent Tolesano said: “Marion never intended to contest nor question the attacks of September 11, 2001, and regrets the way old remarks have been taken out of context.”

The apology coincided with Cotillard preparing to fly to Chicago next week to start filming Public Enemies with Johnny Depp - a movie that was set to become the first big money spinner for the previously unknown actresses .

In fact Cotillard, a green activist for Greenpeace, had used an interview with the French channel Paris Première to make her views abundantly clear.

Speaking on the cinema discussion programme Paris Dernière in February 2007, Cotillard had said: “I think we’re lied to about a number of things”, even claiming the Americans 9114.jpghad destroyed the Twin Towers themselves because the were an outdated “money sucker”.

Expanding her conspiracy theory, Cotillard said it would been “a lot more expensive” to rebuild the towers “which is why they were destroyed”, with the loss of thousands of American lives.

Never intended to question the attacks?  Remarks taken out of context?  It’s amazing how people can backpedal when millions of dollars are at stake.  Lives, however, apparently are expendable.  If you don’t like it here, then go make your little movies somewhere else.

Her ignorant words and arrogant attitude are an insult to all those who perished, survived, and overcame those horrific attacks.  Yet another reason why actors shouldn’t be involved in politics…they need to stick to what they know best, which is pretending to be something they are not and living in alternate realities.

Oh wait.

Posted by k
Filed under: Academy Awards, Conspiracy Theories, Huh?, Pain and Horror, Photographic Evidence, Real Heroes, You Can't Fix Stupid

02/25/2008 (6:39 pm)

More Oscar Snobbery, Brad Renfro Ignored In Memoriam

bradrenfro.jpg

This is exactly what I was alluding to in my earlier post about the inherent snobbery which goes into the selection process of the Academy Awards. Character actors are often ignored for their great performances for what can only be what Academy voters deem as a lack of versatility, or even popularity by the masses. If the people voted for whom they deemed to have given the best performance, I am sure the outcome would be different more often than not.


Actor Brad Renfro
appeared in 21 films before his tragic death on January 15, from a heroin overdose. Brad was 25 at the time of his death, and his recent life had been marred by substance abuse problems, including an arrest in 2005 for attempting to purchase heroin. This however, does not diminish his talent or his previous work, which garnered him critical acclaim at the time. His first role was in the blockbuster The Client, a film adaptation of a book by John Grisham. (I love his books btw)

He also starred alongside the likes of Brad Pitt, Dustin Hoffman, Robert de Niro and Kevin Bacon in Sleepers, and with Scarlett Johannson in the indie classic Ghost World. In 1995, he won Hollywood Reporter’s “Young Star” award, and was voted nominated in the People’s “Best 30 Under 30.”

My point is, while Brad had derailed his career at the end, he was hardly a nobody and was certainly someone people in the industry respected for having talent and potential. They didn’t ignore Heath Ledger who died because of an accidental overdose, but of course, he’d been nominated for an award.

The Academy has released a statement to Us Magazine, stating:

“It was really an editing decision because we can’t fit everyone in,” a rep for the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences tells Usmagazine.com. “There was no specific reason.”

That’s some BS right there. Heath Died AFTER Brad, and how hard would it have been to stick Brad’s picture in there? Seriously, this industry takes these young people, throws them into a world of excess, practically plies them with drugs, sucks them of their soul and then discards them like yesterday’s trash.

Tell me Academy, how about you edit this, you buttlicks!

middle.jpg

Posted by D
Filed under: Academy Awards, Brad Renfro, Celebrity Culture, Conspiracy Theories, R.I.P

12/21/2007 (10:00 am)

Casey Calvert’s Death Not As Innocent As Fans and Band Professed

casey.jpg

Well, I hate to say I told you so (no I don’t, I actually enjoy it a bit) but it seems this celeb death WAS full of mysterious circumstances, and what I mean by that is, another rock n’ roller died of a drug overdose.

Hawthorne Heights guitarist Casey Calvert’s toxicology report shows he died of a drug overdose cause by a combination of “opiates and the antidepressant citalopram and the anti-anxiety medication clonozepam.” It was an accidental overdosing, but I am sure that provides zero comfort to his family, friends, bandmates and fans.

Based on the level of vitriol that was hurled at me (read the comments on the original post for backstory), Casey must have been an exceptionally well-loved young man, full of talent and promise. I am sorry he died, but this sad story is further proof that fame and money often contribute to excess and poor judgment.


But wait, there’s more…

Posted by D
Filed under: Conspiracy Theories, Drugs, Pain and Horror, R.I.P, Sadness

11/27/2007 (3:44 pm)

When Famous People Die, It’s Always Mysterious

In the last couple of days we’ve had three relatively famous people die, two apparently for no known medical reason and one from a gunshot wound, which may or may not have been the result of a crime.

Call me a skeptic, or a pessimist or even a hateful misanthrope, but why do they bother lying to us (us being the public) when they know eventually we will find out the truth? Delusional.


But wait, there’s more…

Posted by D
Filed under: Celebrity Culture, Celebrity Justice, Conspiracy Theories, Crazies

11/12/2007 (11:29 pm)

Was Ellen Right To Cross The Writer’s Picket Line?

ellenstrike1.jpg

Ellen DeGeneres is a well-liked figure in Hollywood and by her viewing public, but her recent actions have brought her more flak than Iggy ever did.  Her decision to continue with her show in the wake of the writer’s strike has brought the wrath of the WGA down on her head:strike10.jpg

That move sparked an inter-union brawl between AFTRA and the WGA after DeGeneres — who belongs to both unions — opted to continue working on her daytime talker during the past week.

The fight came into the open Friday, when the WGA East issued a press release blasting DeGeneres for continuing to perform comedy in violation of strike rules: “Ellen said she loves and supports her writers, but her actions prove otherwise.”

AFTRA topper Kim Roberts Hedgpeth declared in a letter to WGA East chief Mona Mangan that DeGeneres is required to work.

“As you know, AFTRA members such as Ms. DeGeneres who are working under the AFTRA Network TV Code (which covers ‘The Ellen DeGeneres Show’) are legally required by the no-strike clause of that contract to report to work and perform their AFTRA-covered responsibilities,” she wrote. “Ms. DeGeneres, along with thousands of entertainment-industry workers represented by AFTRA and other unions who are bound by similar no-strike clauses, are also reporting to work as legally required.”

But Mangan said DeGeneres is wrong: “Beyond any issue of membership, there is the obvious ethical issue, which is clearly present in Ms. DeGeneres’ decision to write and produce a show without writers in the face of an industrywide walkout by 12,000 writers.”

Ellen had sat out one show in support of striking writers, but came back the next day with this explanation:

I’ve got to say this is a strange show for me to do. This is weird. Weird. It’s a weird show. Channeling Johnny Carson all of a sudden. [Imitates Carson] “Very Weird. Weird. Weird.” Here’s what the deal is. It’s ’sweeps’, which is a very important time in television. That’s when you do your best shows, your funniest material, you pull out all the stops and you’re doing everything you can because you want everybody watching. Now at this moment, we’re in the middle of this strike. There’s a writer’s strike going on, and here in Los Angeles it’s a huge story. I don’t know where you live, but it’s a huge story in Los Angeles. I want to say I love my writers. I love them. In honor of them today, I’m not going to do a monologue. I support them and hope that they get everything they’re asking for. And I hope it works out soon. In the meantime, people have traveled across the country. They’ve made plans. They’re here. I want to do everything I can to make your trip enjoyable and give you a show. Otherwise you’d just be wandering around and circling Bob Hope Drive.


But wait, there’s more…

Posted by k
Filed under: Behind The Scenes Drama, Conspiracy Theories, Ellen DeGeneres, Hollyweird, Movers and Shakers

11/01/2007 (9:51 am)

Heather Mills Allegedly Has Tape Of Paul McCartney Admitting Hitting Wife Linda

heather3.jpg 

Apparently Heather Mills played an audiotape for British television crews off-camera of a fight between she and Sir Paul, where he allegedly admits hitting his first wife Linda:

Sir Paul’s estranged wife played the tape in an off-camera moment during her emotional tour of TV and radio stations yesterday, according to a newspaper report.

A witness who heard the tape said: “It was quite extraordinary. There were raised voices. Heather and Paul were shouting. Paul can be heard confessing he hit Linda ‘once or twice’.

“No one knew what to do. It was astonishing stuff and seemed to back up Heather’s claim that she’s the victim in all of this.”

What was not clear today was when the tape was made - or why Ms Mills started taping her arguments with Sir Paul. A spokesman for Sir Paul declined to comment.

The tape was played during a lull in the barrage of interviews Heather did with British television yesterday in an attempt to clear her name, which she alleges has been dragged through the mud, and also to try to get the press off her back and keep her family safe.

Yesterday, her PR adviser quit over her decision to do the interviews:

Mr Hall confirmed today that he was no longer representing Ms Mills. He said: “We are still mates but I am not working with her any more. Yesterday she said she wanted to do this TV campaign attacking newspapers, but I have a good relationship with newspapers and my business depends on feeding that good relationship.

“She wanted me to orchestrate this campaign and make calls to newspapers but I have got friends and mates in national newspapers and it didn’t seem right to make those calls and attack them.”

He added that Ms Mills was now handling her own PR. He said she called GMTV herself to set up yesterday’s interview where she showed a folder of clippings and spoke of “4,400 abusive articles” about her.

Mr Hall said: “My advice to her for the past 18 months has been, ‘keep your head down and let’s wait until the divorce is over, and then rebuild your career afterwards’ through the charity and foundations she works for.

“That’s the way it was going. We’ve had very few conversations with newspapers as far as placing any stories are concerned apart from denying the more extreme stuff.”

And this morning, Heather went on NBC’s Today show and had an interview with Matt Lauer, in which she reiterated her claims that the divorce is all Sir Paul’s fault:

She claimed that she told Sir Paul: ‘I’m going to be crucified. I’m going to have a modern day stoning.

You know why we split, you know the truth, you need to stand up and say ‘I am responsible for the break-up of this marriage. You’ll be a hero. It’s very heavily one-sided.’

“I said to him, ‘If you say that, I’ll walk away with nothing and we’ll do a very gentle, quick divorce’.”

Ms Mills claimed: “He promised he’d do that and I have evidence of that. He did nothing. “Why do you think I had to record every single conversation? Because nobody will believe me. I have pleaded, I have begged, he knows I was at suicide point and still, nothing has been done.” Asked if she thought going public would change McCartney’s stance, she claimed: “Sadly I’ve pleaded with him directly for 18 months. “And hopefully if he does listen to any of these interviews he may stand up for his family for the sake of his daughter.” She also lifted the lid on their marriage — saying they would argue about his failure to give away his fortune to charity.


But wait, there’s more…

Posted by k
Filed under: Conspiracy Theories, Divorce, Heather Mills

10/30/2007 (3:26 pm)

Daniel Smith Inquest Postponed

danielhoward.jpg

The inquest into the death of Daniel Smith, son of model/actress Anna Nicole Smith, has been postponed until November 19 because of Tropical Storm Noel.  Magistrate William Campbell says that the purpose is to determine the cause of Daniel’s death and nothing else.  In other words, they have no evidence of homicide and the purpose is not to find a suspect.

Members of Anna’s family, including her mother Virgie, were in the Bahamas for the inquest.  Howard K. Stern was not there, however.

Daniel died on September 10, 2006 in a Nassau hospital while visiting his mother shortly after the birth of his sister, Dannielynn.

Too bad…I’m very curious as to what the inquest will find out.  What do you think he died of…an accidental overdose, natural causes, murder?

Batten down the hatches, you Bahamanian readers, and keep safe.

Posted by k
Filed under: Anna Nicole, Conspiracy Theories, R.I.P

10/22/2007 (10:20 am)

Harry Potter’s JK Rowling Outs Professor Dumbledore: “He’s Gay”

dumbledorecloset.jpg
Albus Dumbledore Comes Out Of The Closet

Wow, and I just thought he was British.

Yes, it’s true, the beloved Hogwart’s Head Master and mentor to Harry Potter is reportedly gay, and apparently carried a torch for his former friend turned rival Grindelwald, whom Dumbledore eventually was forced to duel and subsequently slayed. Talk about heartache. This may come as a shock to many fans of the Harry Potter series, but was understood by the author from the beginning. Rowling goes on to explain the essence of this relationship had much to do with Dumbledore’s reluctance to see the “bad” in Grindelwald, as he was blinded by love. Hmmm…love is a mysterious thing.

So how did this revelation come about? The fabulously wealthy, though quite reclusive author was giving a talk to a group of 1600 or so students at New York’s Carnegie Hall on Friday, when a student asked a profound question. From the Guardian post:

After reading briefly from her mega-selling book, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, on Friday night, Rowling took questions from an audience of 1,600 students. A 19-year-old from Colorado asked about the avuncular headmaster of Hogwarts School: ‘Did Dumbledore, who believed in the prevailing power of love, ever fall in love himself?’

The author replied: ‘My truthful answer to you…I always thought of Dumbledore as gay.’ The audience reportedly fell silent - then erupted into prolonged applause.

Rowling, 42, continued: ‘Dumbledore fell in love with Grindelwald [a bad wizard he defeated long ago], and that added to his horror when Grindelwald showed himself to be what he was. To an extent, do we say it excused Dumbledore a little more because falling in love can blind us to an extent, but he met someone as brilliant as he was and, rather like Bellatrix, he was very drawn to this brilliant person and horribly, terribly let down by him.’

She added: ‘Yeah, that’s how I always saw Dumbledore. In fact, recently I was in a script read-through for the sixth film, and they had Dumbledore saying a line to Harry early in the script saying, “I knew a girl once, whose hair…” I had to write a little note in the margin and slide it along to the scriptwriter, “Dumbledore’s gay!”‘

Amazed by the warm reaction of the audience, Rowling, on her first US tour in seven years, joked: ‘Just imagine the fan fiction now.’

Well, as if the supernatural and overall occult tone of the series wasn’t enough to drive the bible-thumpers into a frenzy, we can only imagine the chaos and anarchy which will ensue based on this information. Let me see if I can prognosticate the future of the right-wing loonie headlines now:

Being Gay OK Says JK! Gay Is The New Black! Harry Potter Makes Children Worship The Devil, And Gay! They’re Here, They’re Queer, Now Burn Those Gay Witches!

Ok, those sucked, but you get my point. Which will likely be lost on the those who oppose Harry Potter anyway. Because you know, literature KILLS.

Seriously, there are worse things in life than being gay.

Like being stupid for example. Um…HELLO!

Posted by D
Filed under: Conspiracy Theories, Gay, Gayness, Harry Potter

Next Page »